Rhyme Time: Stupid Gangstalker Tricks

  Let’s All Go Shopping with Gang Stalkers

by SceneNSantaCruz

*FYI:  DH= Dear Husband

My husband went shopping the other day.
As usual gangstalkers got in his way.
Harassment and stalking is what they do best.
If bystanders get tipped off, they fail the test.

Gangstalkers try to cause maximum stress;
they compete with other bullies, out to impress.
The only way to move up in the gangstalking scene,
is to prove you’re the best at being Nasty and Mean!

Some of you will raise shoulders and shrug:
“who would want to be a low-level thug?”
Not your dream when you started school?
It’s ideally suited for those who are cruel.

I’ve exaggerated here, but not by much…
just poetic license for a humorous touch.
The years of harassment in ways that seem dumb
is so relentless, you eventually grow numb.

It’s deliberately ridiculous, so when you point it out,
your story will likely be met with doubt.
But in harassment, it isn’t the parts, it’s the sum.
Gangstalking sucks, so let’s have a little fun!

So back to my husbands shopping trip that day:
they were impatient for to him to get underway.
They waited outside, circling the block,
revving their engines, they were eager to stalk!

When DH (dear husband) finally gets in the car and hits the road
they fall in behind, flashing signals in gangstalker code.
Then they all turn on headlights for the day time ride,
in a truly mockable display of gangstalker pride!

DH drove round the block, parked, came back in.
Now they were angry; and he wore a grin.
An hour later, when he really left for the store,
the stalkers weren’t as happy as they’d been before.

When he parks his car and heads for the front,
its time for a classic gangstalker stunt!
When pissed off, stalkers pull out all the stops,
you’re bound to see some theatrical props.

A few rush ahead to beat him to the door.
The objective: settle a gangstalker score!
They were only following him on foot and by car
how dare he make them feel like the idiots they are.

So up ahead several stalkers now form a que,
to get into a store that’s not special or new.
The blind woman who drove her car here today,
taps with her white cane, and begins the delay.

The next guy’s backpack hits the floor,
spilling its contents right in the door.
Each item’s thoroughly examined, then put away
as he blocks the doorway, for his extended stay.

Sadly, the next one seems touched a bit!
She’d go inside, if her cart would just fit!
Never mind the door’s twice as wide,
she’s punishing the walls on either side!

Five minutes later DH gets through the door,
the stalkers are inside, but he’s followed by more.
For a flash mob, a large group isn’t unusual at all.
A widely distributed text notifies, via broadcast call.

Some gangstalkers will be where you are, almost every time.
Others only come when it’s convenient or prime.
They don’t always know each other on sight,
but they all know HARASSMENT isn’t legal or right!

Inside the store, one group heads off to set the next delay;
the rest follow my DH too close, deliberately get in his way.
gangstalkers try to strike the balance between subtle and rude,
while my husband goes about his business, shopping for food.

The group parked at the end of the baking and cereal aisle,
has turned their carts sideways, gangstalker style.
Large glasses and hoodies cover each face.
When the aisle is impassable, everything’s in place.

When my husband arrives, it should look unplanned:
just unaware shoppers, searching for a favorite brand.
Their phones are on vibrate, so when they get the call
10 simultaneous messages, won’t make a sound at all.

Then they all get a text message as my husband draws near:
“He’s coming you guys, get your asses in gear!”
It’s all fun and games up to this point,
but it won’t take much to break up the joint.

So ’round to the head of the aisle he came,
an unwilling participant in today’ stalker game.
He sees them waiting down at the end,
pretending to be shoppers, trying to blend.

But hiding their faces while they linger and lurk,
doesn’t say “shopper”, like it screams “Stupid Jerk!”
They are newbies… strange, suspicious, and so “not-cool.”
Their asses missed some classes in Gangstalker School.

When he first sees them they’re all averting their eyes,
thanks to that heads up from one of their spies.
He watches them as they suddenly busy themselves
appearing fascinated with the goods on the shelves.

 

They plan not to not to notice him when he gets near.
When he says “excuse me” they’ll pretend they can’t hear!
They’ll draw it out just as long as they’re able
or until some innocent customer arrives at the table

A few minutes later, when they finally let him get by
out will snake a gangstalker foot, ever so sly.
My husband is well aware of the awaiting score
we’ve both been through this many times before.

My husband looks at the trap that they’ve laid
someone didn’t get how the hand should be played
Those rookies are trapped between him and their carts,
in a clear display of missing tactical smarts.

DH took a deep breath, there was a tangible pause.
He wondered how dedicated they were to the cause.
What will they sacrifice to be a gangstalking star?
Then he speaks to them slowly, like the fools they are:

“I’m giving you a chance to get this right,
by the time I get down there you better be out of sight!
now get the damn shopping carts out of my way
Or… you can leave them there, and make my day!”

Suddenly my husband hunkers down low,
shopping cart in front, ready to go.
He’d filled it with canned goods for added weight,
and before they knew it, he was out of the gate!

He headed toward them picking of speed.
They moved surprisingly quickly, spurred on by need!
They could hardly forfeit this game fast enough!
They liked to play, but they hated it rough!

“Coming through!” The last warning was loud…
and the shopping cart, like a missile, parts the crowd!
They cleared the aisle in the nick of time,
leaving no blood, just the usual trail of slime.

Since no gangstalker got hurt today,
they all live to stalk another day..
And that means DH will get another chance
to make some gangstalkers, really dance.

And gangstalker, you stupid fool
you really think what you do is cool?
You can’t possibly think you are making the world great…
by spreading lies and stirring up hate.

Your insincere displays of gangstalker pride
are usually accompanied by a face that you hide.
And dear gangstalker, what you seem to not even know
is that on any importance scale, you rank very low.

If your job description includes “harass and hound”
if you stalk, lurk and follow people around,
you are apparently only valuable enough
for unimportant, uninformed, busy work stuff!

It is painfully obvious that if you were smart,
you wouldn’t be dogging my shopping cart!!

Dear readers, this is what its like for us, every day
constant harassment, by people that don’t go away.
They converge on us, wherever we go,
they hide in plain sight, putting on a show.

Annoying people may seldom cross your path,
but for gangstalked victims, it defies random math.
If you don’t believe this, or have any doubt
I’ve got a link to help you out:

fightgangstalking.com is where you should go
to learn everything about gangstalking, you need to know.

SceneNSantaCruz

Gangstalking Blog Readers Come from 89 Countries

I wanted to share a couple things with you that will encourage you to believe that those of us who are victims are getting the word out. We’ve had a little help from all the fake victims (ie. gangstalker disinfo agents)– who weren’t able  stop spouting nonsense long enough to notice when enough disinfo, became too much disinfo…. effectively pushing the previously unfamiliar term “Gang Stalking” into the mainstream English lexicon.  Even better,  you don’t have to have an intimate knowledge of what it is  to get the immediate understanding that it is  perpetrated by a group that stalks and harasses.

Gangstalking:  such an appropriate term for bullying, following and harassing someone by those who feel powerful only when they can bully with the support of other equally morally challenged pals.  Bullying is just so much more rewarding (and effective) when bullies band together. With other bullies praising your nasty behavior and frequent in-group back patting and fawning…. you might be able to forget that bullying is flat out WRONG!  How else can you explain so many people jumping at the opportunity to dish out hurtful behavior and be flat-out mean….  If you are a gangstalker, despite your new set of norms and your group’s twisted morals…. know this:  Mean people really do Suck!  Being the biggest bully on the block seems to be a truly coveted title in our neighborhood, judging by the sheer number of people aspiring to it.

The fourth anniversary of the Earthquake that hit Japan and sent damaging waves to the Santa Cruz Yacht Harbor,  was a sort of a milestone for me.  While waiting on the shore, watching for the predicted waves to arrive, I was followed by someone, who I felt  certain  was stalking me.  That same day, the picture taking of our house, our yard  and us, began in earnest.  Later that day my husband and I were followed on our walk by a group of three people.  Three people that I continued to see, wherever I was for several months to follow.  I would emerge from a store and one of them would be crouched down in front of my car taking a picture of it (or so it appeared).  They would move away as I got close enough to ask them about it.  I started this blog about 6 months after that.  A lot happened in those 6 months.  We tried a lot of things to get help and to get a handle on this suddenly bizzare shift in our day to day interactions with strangers. We have learned so much about organized harassment since then.  It’s ineviteble when it goes on around you every day for four years.

I still think making this a crime that is recognized, as such. by people who have never experienced it, is the key to stopping it.  Talking about it, writing about it and familiarizing people with is working.  Speaking articulately and credibly about gang stalking is key.  Remember:  Devils. Fallen Angels, Demons, Reptilians  Aliens, Chem Trails, Secret Implants, Occult, Witchcraft etc..  are  not going to get top billing in any legitimate blog or website discussing gangstalking.  I filter out comments that focus on hocus pocus.  (that unintended rhyme is quite amusing to me –I just like the way it sounds… but enough… lets not focus on hocus pocus!)

The good news is my blog stats, while modest, show a marked increase from 2012.  (I need to devote some time to learning how to get my blog found on the Internet by people who are looking for info on Gang Stalking– you have to go through a lot of search hits and pages, before I pop up).  But still, for a hard to find blog, like this one,  the interest in Gang Stalking is on the rise.  That means we are getting the word out…  We are making progress.  Here are the stats that prove it.

Total Views to Date (September, 7, 2015)   39,762 for JustifiablyDisturbedbyGangstalking.com. That breaks down as 18,415 Visitors from 89 different countries.  I do realize that if I posted more frequently, some of my visitors would be repeat  visitors.  But, the numbers are encouraging to me.  We all know that a good portion of those visitors are, the criminals —  (sadly, this blog would not be possible had it not been for their tedious, relentless dedication to the art of bullying).  I do wonder if I had done a blog on something like, crafting…. managing just 34 posts in 4 years, would I have anyone reading it?

They probably wouldn’t hail from 89 countries, but the good news is this:

when you are being gangstalked…. you have a built in fan base for whatever obscure topic or random musings you might want to share with anyone willing to read your blog.  So, even if nobody was interested in my blog on crafting or what have you….  Some stalker would be reading it.  Just like some shopper with no interest in crafting, following me around Michael’s while I comb through beads, paper, yarn and paint.

I do know I need to blog more.  I have a lot to share.  We have learned a lot about the structure of the gangstalking program here in Santa Cruz and in more populated areas of California (gee, those are hard to come by.)  We see these people and are harassed by them every single day… multiple times in a single day.  We know quite a bit about them.  We can make educated guesses about many things that we have no direct knowledge of.  Exposure is key.  Nobody lives in a vacuum.  Being human is a lifelong learning experience.

Since every victim experiences different facets of the same harassment, tailored to fit the circumstances, we probably have insights that others would find useful, or might help them to make sense of their circumstances.    It seems less and less bizarre and more and more carefully planned as the years go by.  They say you can get used to anything…  too bad we have to.

Other people surely have tips on what has worked and what has backfired in dealing with stalkers.  My husband swears his Go Pro keeps stalkers at bay.  When he takes his helmet off, Go Pro stays on top and the helmet sits in the top basket of the shopping cart  (even if he only is planning to buy enough to fill a hand cart… the  Go Pro gets a better view in the push cart).  He says THEY STAY AWAY when they see the camera.

That tip might help someone…  share yours… and I promise to be a more active blogger!

Law Enforcement Initiated Gang Stalking

The article below was published on  Free Press Houston. I included the entire text in this post, but you can find the original here:  Gang-Stalking-Government- Style

What you are about to read describes a Gangstalking Campaign initiated by the Houston Police Officer’s Union in response to an inflammatory remark made by an individual on his Facebook page. Tasteless or not, last time I checked inflammatory remarks were protected by the US constitution.

I do think this particular Harassment Campaign was less organized and systematic than the typical Gang Stalking Campaign (such as the one experienced by most victims of this nasty crime, myself included)  Nevertheless, the results of actions taken by the Police Union, in this case were certainly forseeable. I believe they knew exactly what was going to happen to Evan Carroll when they posted his name and address, phone number and employer information on their Facebook page. They KNOWINGLY set a mob of law enforcement affiliated individuals in motion, INTENDING for them to dish out vigilante justice on someone who had offended them with a tasteless remark.

I would also like to suggest that their response was an immediate reaction to feeling provoked. Those of us who haven’t offended them in such an emotionally charged way (but offended them nonetheless) get the slow methodical programmed type of vigilante justice that has the ability to fly under the radar.  That would be:  the oh so carefully planned and thought-out gangstalking campaign, which affords the perpetrators plausible deniablility, and the victims completely unwarranted skepticism.  (If you missed my personal story of how I offended  the California Highway Patrol, — by exercising my legal rights effectively– , you can find it here:  California Highway Patrol:  Above the Law }

Can anyone read this article and not think the police are absolutely aware of gangstalking, despite public denials, and the skepticism with which they treat victims reporting the crime?  Everything I write,  is to convince skeptics that when victims say they are being harassed by multiple strangers, … your skepticism is uninformed and close minded.  Read the article below and see if you can honestly claim that strangers would never participate in a mob-like harassment of an individual they did not know personally.  It happens, and has happened throughout history.

When it comes to gangstalking, this article makes clear that not only is law enforcement fully aware of gangstalking crimes, they participate in it, and sometimes (even at the local level) initiate it.

See what you think….

 

Houston FreePress

December 27, 2014

GANG STALKING, GOVERNMENT STYLE

By Remington Alessi

“I’m just another white guy who wrote something people didn’t like online,” Evan Carroll sighs as he sinks into his armchair.

This all began when the Houston Police Officer’s Union posted Carroll’s home address, phone number, and employment information on their official Facebook page, accompanied with the caption, “For all of our Kingwood officers, apparently this person is extremely anti-police.”

Visibly tired, he has already turned away countless reporters, curious neighbors, and food delivery people, the latter of whom have been sent as part of childish pranks by an army of anonymous gang stalkers, many of whom are members of local law enforcement agencies. Police and civilians alike have driven by, leering at the front of Carroll’s residence; a random person tore up his parents’ yard; threatening phone calls have come in as often as four times per minute, and countless complaints have been filed against his real estate license with every professional agency available. This is gang stalking taken to an entirely new level.

Though Facebook eventually removed the post, it was too late for the Internet to forget. A virtual invitation to gang stalk Carroll rippled through right wing channels on the internet, being shared tens of thousands of times across law enforcement pages, with a local FOX affiliate even airing his phone number on the evening news. A photo below has been edited to exclude Carroll’s personal information, but the edits are mine, and were not done by the local news team.

At time of writing, neither the Houston Police Officers’ Union nor the Houston Police Department would respond for comment. One might wonder if there was a staff shortage due to members of both organizations taking time off in order to engage in gang stalking, as appears to be the case.

One might naturally wonder what Carroll could have said to set off this kind of reaction. On his own personal Facebook page, Carroll typed, “2 down, 49,000 to go. Not ‘an execution’ just a minor insurrection and a bit of humble revenge,” in response to the shooting deaths of two NYPD officers. Inflammatory as this may be, it could be interpreted as a less poetic way of conveying author Tim Wise’s sentiments on the matter: “If you treat communities like you are an occupying army don’t be surprised when folks assume you have declared war on them. And then don’t be shocked when some decide to declare war back.”

As so often is the case, this incident will most likely be used as a pretext to tighten security or otherwise add to the mission creep of the various government agencies assigned the task of protecting the shit out of us from behind every mailbox. It may be easy, at this point, to take the propaganda bait and blame the man engaging in political speech, as is so often the case. Certainly corporate media will even encourage you to do so. However, it is important to not shift the moral burden away from the army of oppressors who seek to control this country with violence and threats, because they are, as Dr. King once said, “the greatest purveyors of violence in the world today,” both then and now.

In the world of Facebook, all it took was some viral sharing by a few incensed individuals for the entire post to snowball, sparking a mob mentality and becoming a rallying cry for police from Houston all the way to New York to begin threatening to murder Carroll. Judging from the backlash Carroll has received, the participants closely resemble the police he opposes; hiding behind a lack of accountability, their responses are cowardly, crude, and childish, but they ultimately are the dying gasps of an army that has lost its legitimacy.

Gangstalkers Are NOT Invisible!!

I don’t need to convince other victims of Gangstalking that my husband and I are stalked everywhere we go, harassed daily by numerous complete strangers or that we are under surveillance 24/7. Other victims already know all about it. We see things that other people don’t.

Raising awareness about gangstalking means helping the unaware public to see what it is, that victims see. If anyone but the targeted victim can see the harassment, gangstalking loses a lot of its power. Seeing is believing, or so the saying goes.  The reverse of that is also true.  This means people tend to resist believing in what they don’t see. The problem with this is, you look with your eyes, but you see with your brain.  Just because you don’t see my Gangstalkers harassing me right in front of you, doesn’t mean you can’t!

 

Everybody can be trained to pay attention and be more observant. That said, perception is a funny thing.   Our eyes take in vast amounts of information. The brain filters, and processes all those visual cues, as well as input from our other sensory organs.   Our amazing brains, instantaneously, sift, sort, compare, compartmentalize, organize, and prioritize those sensory cues to make sense of the world around us, orienting us in our physical space and determining appropriate responses to the current environment.  Much of this is hardwired, such as the tendency for the brain to try to find patterns in those visual cues.   Presumably the ability  to pick out a predator, camouflaged against a backdrop of jungle foliage, was a beneficial skill for our ancestors to have.   It could mean the difference between having dinner and being dinner.

If the brain perceives a threat in the proximal environment, it understandably, gives it top priority.  Sensory cues determined by the brain to be high priority, get our attention.  It is the high priority cues that become conscious thoughts; those conscious thoughts get stored in short-term memory.   Top priority events also become conscious thoughts, but they get stored in long-term memory.  This explains why unimportant or trivial events are soon forgotten, while significant events  are  retained for life.

 

What we actually see is heavily influenced by the sum of our personal experiences. How well we pay attention, and what it is that we pay attention to, are skills, and, as such, they improve with practice.   Take a minute and look at the video below.

You are asked to do a simple task: Count how many times a ball is passed back and forth, between players. Despite the fact that every pass is done right in front of you, where you can see it, people often don’t get the answer right,  because it requires undivided attention – something modern multitaskers don’t do enough of.

Turn on the volume so you can hear the instructions. Be sure to remember your score when you finish watching. 

 

 

---

I have an analogy to explain why two people in the same environment might not see the same thing :

Two women spend the day together at a small, but busy, public beach.
At the end of the day each woman is asked to discuss the dogs they saw during the 6 hours they spent at the beach.

The first woman has cats. She loves her cats but doesn’t have much use for dogs. She doesn’t dislike dogs but she didn’t grow up with dogs and she lives in an apartment where they aren’t allowed. Her sister’s boyfriend has a dog, but she doesn’t see it often;  that’s really the only dog she knows. When it comes to dogs, she is indifferent.

The second woman was savagely bit by a neighbor’s dog when she was five and she still has the physical scars.  She doesn’t have a dog, she is afraid of them. She knows lots of people who have dogs, but she doesn’t visit them; she wouldnt:  they have dogs.  Her entire life she has had dog lovers trying to convince her that she has nothing to fear from dogs. They go on ad nauseum about their precious pooches, showing her pictures, like they were children, or even worse, begging her to pet them or interact with them. She is definitely not indifferent to dogs.

There were 24 dogs at the off leash beach, during the six hours the women spent there. When asked to discuss the dogs they saw that day, as you might imagine, the woman give very different answers.

The first woman said she saw dogs at the beach but she can’t really remember how many or what kind. She hardly noticed them. But she does remember there was one dog that ran past their blanket, chasing after a stick. She remembers it was big but she doesn’t remember much about how it looked. What she does remember is that the guy throwing the stick was really good-looking.

The second woman not only remembers the dogs, she can describe most of them. Surprisingly, she knows the breeds of several of them. She can tell you which ones were on leash,  because, she says they were running wild.   She can describe almost all of them,  right down to their sizes and whether they obeyed their respective owners, or not. She formed opinions  about what she perceived to be the temperaments of some of the doges.    Additionally she, could practically map out  the particular spot where the dogs and their owners had set up for the day, relative to their own spot on the sand. She says there were dogs running loose, fighting with each other,  not obeying their owners and completely out of control, and that it went on  all day long.   She adds that because of the “dog problem”, she’ll never go back to that particular beach again.

There is no doubt that the same dogs and the same women were all on the beach at the same time.  But what they actually saw at the beach that day is so dissimilar that it is hard to believe they were together.

They both had the same sensory input, but they perceived it quite differently. The brain will always give priority to a perceived, implied or potential threat. Gangstalking is just such a threat. For the record, viscous dogs have far better manners than gang stalkers.  A dog does not attack out of malice.

Gangstalkers, on the other hand conspire, premeditate and proceed with an intent to harm another person.  There is nothing innocent or excusable about the crime of gangstalking OR the people who take part in it.

 

Before a victim is aware of any gangstalking activity, these criminals have  already been covertly stalking, observing, and collecting publicly and privately available data about their target.  They’ve already invaded their victims privacy, using available technology, regardless whether it is legal or not.

It is only after this phase that they unleash the hounds. or dupes. or rank and file gangstakers,. or cult followers, or brainwashed devotees, or hash house harassers…. or what ever you want to call  people who will leap from the toilet at a moments notice if you suddenly leave your house, so they can stalk you.  (That thought alone, is one of the things that makes it so satisfying to take a leisurely trip, by car around the block, one time, before going back inside.) Remember, its not the smart ones who are actually doing the following and harassing.
During the reconnaissance phase, I went about my business just like every other unaware person out there. I don’t doubt that they were there, I just didn’t see them.  During this covert phase they are figuring out what your personal triggers are. What is it that bugs you? Is it traffic? Is it waiting in line? Is it rude people? Is it a particular stereo type…. homeless people, people from a particular ethnic group, gays, bible thumpers, bad parents, screaming children, polititians, people who leave trash in your yard? What ever it is, that personally irritates you is fair game. The harassment is personalized and tailored to play out in a public setting where only the players know who the actors are OR even that there are actors.

Then they start to pester you; if something doesn’t get your attention, they move on to the next offensive behavior on the list. The gangstalkers in the field pass on what they learn (i.e. what works on you) and they adapt, until they have your undivided attention. There is no shortage of the rude behaviors that multiple minds on a mission to annoy, can come up with.

When you first realize people are deliberately harassing you it is upsetting and unnerving. Just like the woman bitten by the dog, Gangstalkers get your attention because they are hostile, and they are a threat. If I didn’t notice them, my brain would not doing the job of prioritizing threats and making me acutely aware of their presence, despite all the other sensory stimuli my eyes and ears are taking in. Retail stores are filled with sites, colors, sounds; every product is placed to attract your attention. The unaware person is like the first girl on the beach. The victim is like the second girl at the beach.  But the perceived threat is much more real when it deliberately seeks you out.  Unlike the gangstalkers, the dogs were not at the beach BECAUSE the woman was there.  Gangstalkers, on the other hand are at the same place you are, BECAUSE you are there.  Planning and Intent raise the stakes and increase the threat.  And what threatens us, gets our attention.

Are gang stalkers  a real threat or just perceived as one? Put it this way, when you are stalked or harassed it gets your attention, and it makes you notice things you would have overlooked in the past.  Hyper-vigilance is a hard wired survival response when threatened. Gang Stalking is no joke.

Fact based evidence, proving a Gangstalking Program is ongoing and currently active can be found at the appropriately named, gangstalkingismurder.com  The site is extremely well documented with affidavits, government responses to FOIA requests, and main stream news reports on the topic.

Gangstalking really is murder…. I’d say that’s a threat.  I will explain why I think that this is fair and appropriate assessment of actual intent behind gangstalking in another post.

The purpose of today’s post was to convince you that you do not see EVERYTHING that goes on around you. Hopefully I’ve done that… but my ultimate goal is to open eyes. I want the unaware public to see what actually goes on around me and other victims of Gangstalking.

Gangstalking: The Distraction of “Busy Work”

 

I know a lot of people do not believe that a large group of people would stalk someone. Do you think that before World War  Two, ANY Germans, Jews, Americans, or other Europeans would have believed that a large group of people (Educated people, Civilized People) would use their intelligence to mechanically plan, design and carry out mass exterminations of other human beings living among them? Killing the largest amount of people  in the most efficient way, was treated like a manufacturing problem, with solutions devised accordingly.  It boggles the mind…. the kinds of things that humans will overlook, participate in or promote. Don’t believe it? Check out this episode of What Would You Do? where seemingly average people shopping willingly become accomplishes to crimes from stealing a wallet,  to kidnapping a baby. The reason? A complete stranger with a fake badge approached them, telling a lie and asking for their help.  That’s all it took for almost everyone approached to become an accessory to criminal acts.  Are you the type to obey an authority figure… even when they ask you to break the law?

No truly evil conspiracy starts out in the open where everyone can see and weigh in on it. Hitler would have never come to power if he had announced his intentions early on. Hitlers rise to power was insidious. Gangstalking is Insidious. It is like a creepy, invasive, persistent evil that is palpable. It happens when something is pushing into your life and with it comes a sense of dread and trepidation about things to come. Insidious is described perfectly in an essay written by an Austrian woman about Hitler’s takeover of Austria. It is a perfect description of how quickly something evil and insidious can take hold right in front of people who either can’t see it or refuse to. You may read some things discrediting the essay, saying it is not factually accurate or politically motivated. There may be some truth to that, but by and large, it explains exactly how Hitler took Austria without firing a shot — which nobody disputes. It describes the effectiveness of Propaganda and Economic Crisis in gaining acceptance for otherwise unacceptable policy changes. Our own War on Terror is a perfect example of how change happens and the unacceptable becomes acceptable.

There is a new book out called Shadow Government. Read this interview with the author to get a feel for the way our Government is morphing into something the majority of its citizens neither want nor will ultimately recognize. The author expresses a real concern that if people do not pay attention and mobilize against it…. it may soon be too late. Distraction is one of many tools that effectively keeps a population in passive acceptance of government overreach.

Gangstalking is a great tool for distraction. It’s busy work for people who have been duped into thinking they are playing an important role.  They’ve been made to feel important, sworn to secrecy, given special perks or consideration and they have bought into it with a vengeance. Many of them really think they are secret agents working on behalf of a shadow government. They believe they are making an important difference. The illusion of being important is what keeps them busy. Busy is shopping in stores that have nothing they want to buy. Busy is waiting around for a victim to leave the house, finish shopping, finish anything…..so they can follow.  Busy is a coordinating a show of force with a headlight line up. (By the way… that is one of the things that makes targets laugh at gangstalkers ; it certainly looks like irrefutable evidence that they must be more than a couple beers short of a six-pack. )  For keeping people distracted from what’s important…. the gangstalking tool is an excellent choice. It also has the advantage of wreaking havoc on the lives of a  few, which in some cases is, no doubt, useful.   This might also explain random targets. You can’t keep Gangstalkers busy if they don’t have someone to stalk. Most victims of gangstalking have come to realize that the numbers tell the real story. This is more about the large population of gangstalkers than it is a about the relatively small number of targets.

Gang Stalking takes place in the shadows. People often ask who would waste their time gangstalking? A better question would be who would benefit by keeping people chasing their tails? Who benefits from distraction, especially distraction on a large scale?

Did any targets go as a Trojan Horse for Halloween?  It would have been a highly appropriate choice!

Part 7: CHP’s Absurd Motion to Vacate

Internal Affairs Investigates

I really didn’t expect my complaint with the CHP Internal Affairs Division to go anywhere, and it didn’t. As I said, it wasn’t organized or well thought out. I felt pushed  into making my initial complaint a Formal complaint. I  told Lieutenant Desmond that I didn’t need to make it formal,   I just wanted to collect on the Judgement.   He told me if I didn’t make  a Formal Complaint the investigation would be closed.  That would have put me back where I started, so I filled out the complaint form they sent me.
The complaint as written by Internal Affairs paraphrased my words saying that I had alleged Kelly Walker was evasive, and unprofessional during inquiries into my legal judgement. YA THINK? Just a tad more formal, than I had put it, but as they say “good enough for Government work“.
Kelly Walker was not important to me. She was merely a gate-keeper, who wasn’t quite up to the task.  It is quite possible to run interference for a boss and still come across as likeable and even helpful. See my post about the Deputy Chief at the Santa Cruz Police Department, if you want to see how its done.
Avoidance isn’t really a good tool for managing situations or people. When unable to avoid them, obvious lies are another bad choice. Yeah, I’d say she was unprofessional, allegedly!

---

The Unspoken Message

One odd thing I noticed was that the people in Legal Affairs and Risk Management, were noticeably hostile towards me, during many of my phone inquires. I really have a hard time understanding that. They were absolutely acting like I didn’t deserve a second of their time and like I was screwing over the Highway Patrol in general, and them personally. This seemed to be inexplicably personal to them — they were angry at me, and it showed.  This started before I contacted Internal Affairs for help.  From my point of view the hostility was misplaced and undeserved.  It’s creepy, when you think about it.
This narrow-minded way of thinking, seems central to the culture of the California Highway Patrol: They are above the law, and they resent anybody who tries to infringe on their entitlement.  How else can you explain losing a lawsuit and refusing to comply with a court order? They didn’t think I deserved to challenge their authority in court; They were angry at me for putting them in this position;  I had threatened their power and their Right to always be RIGHT.  They had no intention of rewarding or reinforcing me for this. 
There was an unspoken message conveyed through all this hostility.  I’m  fairly intuitive and my perception of the message still feels right to me, almost 5 years later.  The message was one of indignation:

“WHO DO YOU THINK YOU ARE?  HOW DARE YOU DO THIS TO THE CALIFORNIA HIGHWAY PATROL”

That so many employees seem to buy into and uphold this warped perception, which is so removed from the intended role of the Highway Patrol, seems strangely,  indoctrinated to me. Maybe this unquestioning loyalty (regardless of morality) is unique to law enforcement agencies (i.e. the blue line).  I thought it was very weird.

---

Balance of Power

The California Highway Patrol behaves in a way that is both self-serving and arrogant.  As an Agency, they seem to be unable or unwilling to hide it. The scary thing is that when Government stops hiding illegal or immoral acts, it’s because they no longer have to. They’ve consolidated enough power to do as they wish and no one can stop them. The CHP is well insulated by California’s Justice System and the Legislature. They aren’t too concerned about acting outside the law. It is a rare occasion when they are held accountable for bad acts.
Our Federal Government is headed that way. They still act embarrassed when they get caught doing something illegal, but nothing changes.  It continues and we just get used to it. Our Government is turning into the monster the Constitution tried to protect us from.  The system that was meant to check and balance Government power, has been so diluted, its impotent.

The Federal Government is currently under-checked and dangerously out of balance. The Legislature has never been more ineffective. The Judicial system is neither blind nor impartial. The Security Agencies have run amok, using secrecy to shield illegal acts and no one seems able or willing to rein them in.  The violations that have been exposed are the tip of the iceberg.

The only thing that government seems to fear at all, is a free press.  Under the Obama administration there have been extraordinary measures to muzzle those that would report or expose immoral, illegal and self-serving government activity. The free internet, whistle blowers and reporters are in the cross-hairs. 

When  a voracious non native species, with no natural enemies, is introduced into an environment it either fundamentally changes or destroys that environment and is harmful to native inhabitants. Freedom of Speech and Freedom of the Press are natural enemies to Government Abuse of Power.  If the government is successful in its efforts to limit those freedoms, they’ve essentially vanquished their last natural enemy.  It will be harmful  to the inhabitants. We can’t let that happen.

If censorship is successful, the Feds will be just like the CHP: Arrogant, Above the Law and so insulated they don’t even have to act embarrassed when corruption, or any other bad act is exposed.
If these CHP employees think its wrong for a Judge to order their employer (large organization, with big budget)  to return money they seized from an individual, they really ought to see how it feels to be the individual whose money was seized,  bypassing the Judge altogether.  I can tell you right now… that feels like a violation and is a much better reason to be upset.
To see these employees upset when their employer is court ordered to give the money back…. ? Cry me a river.   Boo Hoo!  They had no right to be angry with me. I did everything legally and by the book. They likewise had no right to make collecting on the judgement such a nightmare.
And the delaying, the stalling, the rudeness … it’s not over yet!

---

Internal Affairs Concludes the Investigation

Clearly Kelly Walker was only part (and not the most important part) of my Complaint to Internal Affairs. If you missed it, you can find it here.

The letter informing me of the outcome of the investigation said they didn’t find substantial evidence to support my allegations regarding Staff Services Manager, Kelly Walker……bla bla bla.  They never even addressed the part of the complaint that had to do with the Legal Affairs Department ducking a Court Order.  Unfortunately, I was getting used to that.

But in some respects the Internal Affairs Investigation was helpful. R. Jones, a Captain in the Office of Investigation assigned K. A. Hunter, Legal Affairs Commander and supervisor to Kelly Walker to look into the matter and resolve any issues. It was through Hunter that I was FINALLY given the name and number of Staff Attorney, John McDonough.

I left him a message near the end of June or early July (I think). When he called me back on a Friday afternoon, I really wasn’t expecting to like the man.  But he was funny and charming. He made me laugh.  (A talent he should share with Kelly Walker.)

If you are the Staff Attorney for the CHP and you have to explain why your client (who is duty bound to uphold the law) is breaking the law, a little charm sure can’t hurt.

---

Finally, I Get Some Answers

The big question:

WHAT IS HOLDING UP PAYMENT OF MY COURT ORDERED JUDGEMENT OF $482.00?

We are looking to have the Judgement Vacated. We will be going back before the Judge on the matter.

OH REALLY…. AND ON WHAT GROUNDS?

On the Grounds we were never served.

Really? Because I paid the court $25.00 to serve you. And they gave me a receipt showing Proof of Service.

What address did you use?

Joe Farrell, Attorney General for State of California, at the AG’s Office in Sacramento.

See, you served the Attorney General. You didn’t serve the California Highway Patrol, so we didn’t ever receive it. You needed to serve us for it to be a valid service.

Well that’s funny because…. right on the State of California web site, in the section called “Small Claims Court Self Help” it says :

“IF YOU ARE SUING the California Highway Patrol,  serve them at the Office of the Attorney General. “

Then it gives the address. — The same address I had the court serve you at.

WHAT? Where is this Website…. ? Hold on let me get my legal assistant on that, and I’ll get back to you.

---

Motion to Vacate

The CHP Legal Affairs Department, and John McDonough, specifically, filed a Motion to Vacate the Judgement six months, TO THE DAY,  that the original judgement was filed. We were due back in court near the end of September 2010, where the Judge would hear the Motion.

The reason they gave? It was absurd.  I had a very hard time believing that such a legal maneuver could really exist or be taken seriously in a court of law.
The grounds they used to ask for the Judgement to be vacated were:  Mishap, Inadvertence,  Malfeasance, and failure to realize the importance of showing up for the hearing.

WHAT? I had no idea what that even meant, so I had to look into it. 

First of all, It is absurd to even suggest that the legal arm of the CHP doesn’t realize the importance of showing up in court to defend against a claim.  These people are lawyers.  Most small claims participants have no legal training at all.  When we get served, even without legal training, we know enough to realize that if we don’t go, and mount a defense, you are going to lose. It isn’t possible that this high powered legal team did not realize the importance of being served.  It is not grounds for the Judge to Vacate the original Judgement.

The combination of Mishap, Inadvertence, and Malfeasance is seldom used by an Attorney. It is the equivalent to an admission of incompetence and alludes to  deliberate wrongful action on the part of an Attorney in carrying out their duties.

This is like an Attorney, who is throwing himself on the mercy of court and pleading with the Judge: (Picture the back of a hand, pressed open to forehead with palm facing outward, blinking back big crocodile tears) Oh woe is me, Your Honor, I have made a mess of this. Please don’t allow my client to suffer for my mistakes.

As you can imagine , lawyer jokes aside… Attorneys aren’t scrambling all over themselves to fall on their own swords, calling attention to their incompetence in open court. Not that Lawyers aren’t known for altruistic behavior and self sacrifice for the benefit of their clients. John McDonough, must have been a rare lawyer indeed to make that kind of sacrifice for his poor misrepresented client, the little ‘ol CHP. In reality it was just a BS excuse to get back in front of the Judge.

Unlike most Lawyers who would never risk using this as grounds to vacate, Mr McDonough wasn’t running the risk of  being disciplined, sanctioned or disbarred by making this type of astounding admission for the record and open court.  He wasn’t even going to keep future business at bay, by telling the world he was a bad lawyer.  This was all just an excuse to put us back in front of the Judge.
Furthermore isn’t some incompetent Lawyer, poorly representing the CHP. He is on their Payroll. If he screwed up, they screwed up. He is part of the organization that is the CHP. He does not have a client who was poorly represented. He is the client. He works strictly for the CHP, representing only their interests in all legal matters. He is the Legal Face of the CHP.
The CHP has enough tax dollars to pick and choose among lawyers. They are embroiled in law suits all the time.  If our case fell through the cracks, it was because a Small Claims case meant NOTHING to them. It was insignificant. It only became significant when we won. The CHP doesn’t have to show up in court, because of the substantial hurdles a plaintiff has to get over before the court will hear their case.   It is as the Judge told my husband, when he found our paperwork in order:

“This Never Happens.”

And because nobody ever has the paperwork to prove they can legally sue, the Judge automatically dismisses the case, without any need for the CHP to be present. They don’t show up, because they don’t have to. The Judgement in our favor, was a huge surprise to them.  Apparently, with all their legal resources, they were ill-equipped to deal with Small Claims Court or a Judgement NOT in their favor.  And they were… FURIOUS.
I hope my readers are starting to get the picture of what we were up against here. If you think they have acted like bad losers and have been petty and childish so far…. I am NOT DONE.
The conclusion of this story will appear in the next post.  Things are not as they seem in California.   After I tell you what the CHP did next,  if you live in California, you’ll think they owe you some money now, too . Nobody should be spending our tax dollars this way…. If wasting our money isn’t a crime, it should be. It’s also amusing if you like your humor along the lines of WHAT WERE THEY THINKING? or Americas Dumbest Criminals, you’ll get a kick out of it.
The last post also exposes one more bad act, this one not done by the CHP.  It is , however so blatant and chilling, I think, that everything the CHP did to us, pales by comparison. The CHP, definitely doesn’t have an exclusive on behaving badly.

NOTE To Readers:
Throughout the eight posts that tell this story, I put the real names of the people who handled our case at the CHP. One of those people is almost certainly the person who submitted our name to a government watch list, knowing that it would lead to ongoing stalking, monitoring and constant harassment.  It started four years ago, and continues today.

We aren’t on this list because we are terrorists or a threat to anybody. Our crime was embarrassing the CHP and exercising our legal rights effectively. We threatened the ABOVE THE LAW status that the CHP takes for granted, and we are being punished for it, with no legal recourse.

That is the reason I write this blog,

SceneNSantaCruz

One more thing:

I have never posted any videos of any kind. If you see a video that indicates it came from me or has anything to do with my blog Justifiably Disturbed, you can be certain that it I had nothing to do with it.  If the day comes for me to post videos, you will see them on this blog before you see them on YouTube.

I poke the bear because he won’t let me go

You might have noticed I added a disclaimer to the previous post. I did this in deference to my husband, who despite thinking the CHP has nothing to do with gangstalking, is nevertheless uncomfortable with my publicly writing that I am sure they do.

Poke The Bear

I think on some guttural level most people feel (me included) a little leery of Poking the Bear Especially a bear that has the power and ability to bite back. So to reiterate: It is my opinion that the CHP set our gangstalking in motion. That very statement makes both my husband and I nervous. It’s obvious why Poking this particular Bear makes me apprehensive: I’ve been bitten. If my husband does not think the CHP has anything to do with gangstalking, exactly why is he wary of Poking the Bear?

 

Police get lots of bad press and I am small potatoes. If the California Highway Patrol  is an ethical agency, they aren’t going to be interested in this bloggers opinion.  In theory, I need not worry about  being bitten by legally exercising my right to express myself from an agency that upholds laws.  And yet… in my interactions with them, they have displayed a complete disregard for ethics and the law.  I’m not talking about one  bad apple.  I’m talking about the culture.  So, there is this apprehension….

Could it be that even among the most trusting of us, there is, at our core, a niggling apprehension and distrust of government and its enforcers. I do think most of us are aware enough, to be alarmed by the stripping away of the protections, put in place by the Founding Fathers.   Maybe the uneasiness is because we sense that those diminishing protections,  may be all that stands between us and the snapping jaws of Big Brother. Our liberty is a stake. Our way of life is at stake.

If you would also feel apprehensive, about exercising your legal right (by say…. for example, suing a government agency in small claims court, or writing about it in a blog), you aren’t as free as you think you are. You are feeling the thumb of repression. Government should be working for us… not working us over. Any apprehension at all.  should give you pause. And when you pause… think about what an important tool repression has been. historically to those in power. Not very pretty, is it?

Most people go through life trying to avoid trouble. I’ve always done that. We don’t want police, government or criminal interference in our lives. We just want to live as unfettered and unobstructed as possible. I was naïve in thinking that I could actually sue a powerful branch of law enforcement and emerge unscathed.   It never occurred to me that there might be consequences to seeking a legal remedy to recover money taken from me, money I disputed owing.  I thought the entire collection process was unfair, unconstitutional and would be illegal if done by any group or person, other than the State.  Winning a few battles, felt like victory at the time, but I had no idea I was fighting a war.  And that was before the gangstalking  started. Our nightmare with the CHP began in the summer of 2007. It wasn’t resolved legally until fall of 2010. Add 4 years of gangstalking to that. No, I am not winning this war.  I can’t even walk away from it.

Silly me, I had no idea that doing something perfectly legal would piss off the Highway Patrol as much as it did. I mean…. they are the California Highway Patrol– surely they piss off people daily… probably hourly. People choose their battles. Make ’em mad enough, or treat them bad enough and they just might sue you. The Highway Patrol must get sued all the time, or so I thought. I certainly never could imagine that they would take it personally–extremely personally.

Now… having been through it… I no longer think they get sued in small claims court– at least not very often, and  if they do, they must never lose. The system is rigged, absolutely rigged.  I had to go through it to realize it.  The judgment in our favor seemed to have taken them completely by surprise.

They were, with all their resources, completely unprepared for it. If anyone has ever won against them in small claims court before… I would be very surprised. I used to think an impartial judge made a decision based solely on the merits of a case. Now, I am fairly certain  CHP doesn’t even have to put in an appearance to win.  I think they are a slam dunk and everybody knows it, except opposing parties in law suits (like me)  From what I’ve seen,  our judicial system and law enforcement are one and the same.  Judges can’t be expected to be impartial when they have a horse in the race.

Keith Labella, an attorney and my one of my personal heroes,  has done a lot for gangstalking victims.  He is also no stranger to judges that won’t be swayed by the facts.    Here’s a summary of his recent lawsuit over FOIA request omissions by the FBI   : http://gangstalkingismurder.wordpress.com/gang-stalking-f-o-i-a-lawsuit.  There is a link to the  full text PDF from there, if you want to read it in its entirety.

I am no whistleblower. I am not an activist. I just want to live my life free from harassment. It doesn’t seem like a lot to ask. It’s called the “pursuit of happiness”. You may have heard of it. Well, for the past 4 years the “pursuit of happiness” as been denied us. Gangstalking is covert aggression. An agency, which is in place, strictly for the purpose of upholding the law, would never be able to justify retaliating against anybody that legally sued them in court. You wouldn’t expect them to retaliate at all. But if they did…. they would have to do it covertly.

I don’t believe in violence, but it is pretty obvious that harassment, bullying. mobbing and gangstalking can push people over the edge. I think there is a lot of evidence to support the theory that mass shootings are often preceded by it. Complaints are often lodged with someone in a position of authority about by the (soon to be) shooter, trying to get relief from the harassment.   Later the shooters are described fairly consistently, regardless of the victims,  or the real motives.  You’ve all  heard it before:  The shooter  is described (after the fact) as a loner, a disgruntled employee, anti social or not quite right in the head. I think one of the goals of gangstalking is absolutely to: push people over the edge. They keep the pressure on victims constantly, hoping frustration and rage at the injustice, will do just that.

Being placed on a list by some secret threat assessment committee, signals the start of total and unrelenting, harassment. The fact that being on the list in the first place is what caused a person to go off the rails, just wouldn’t work to further the gangstalking program or the huge expenditures it requires.. When people do blow their tops, it furthers the consensus (among those in the know) that these lists (and the ever tightening noose around the neck of free America) are necessary to find and neutralize potential threats. Cause and effect are obscured by arguments for even more lists, more vigilance and ever more intrusive ways of identifying threats, (thus widening the net) including labeling, identifying and protecting us from the mentally ill (conveniently diagnosed by expert opinion, rather than science). This (they claim) will keep us safe and free from tragedy by preventing crime before it happens. This not only distracts the public, it allows them to marginalize people for crimes they may commit in the future.  Ludicrous as it seems,  this is a well-funded hot research area right now.  I’ll try to give you more information about it some time.

My personal favorite, among methods used to obscure what causes  mass shootings is to break out the old, tired gun control debate– always good for diverting attention and shifting blame.  Nothing ever comes of it, of course, because in the current climate, guns are  useful.  It’s easy to blame guns, and it might not be in your best interest to blame government harassment and blacklisting.

Everybody knows you don’t need a gun for killing, Murder takes place every day,  in almost every country, without them. Guns just make killing more efficient. You can’t grab the attention of our rubber necking society without some substantial carnage. Guns are good for that. This explains why the argument never gets put to rest. It’s a distraction away from the real reason people go postal.

The truth is, nobody in power envisions or wants a future where the civilian majority can legally own a gun. It’s problematic. The day it becomes illegal for civilians to own guns will be the day we can’t get back up the slippery slope. . Until that day, there is still hope for a way of life that allows all people to have their basic needs met and live a life of hope and dignity.

I hate violence. I don’t think it has any place in a civilized society and this…., writing all this crap down and railing passionately on a public forum about societal ills is so not me. It is, instead, the me who has been pushed over the edge by four years of non stop harassment and stalking. The old me didn’t feel the need to stir things up. Even the new me wishes they would just give up, so I could too.

I think about Christopher Dorner and how he destroyed himself to make an impact. He paid the ultimate price. He had other avenues available to get his message out. He was blinded to the possibilities by frustration, indignation and rage at what had been done to him.  Violence is never the answer.  It could be he felt his days were numbered and he had to get the message out very quickly –or never.  A lot of gangstalking victims feel that way.  that their health is in decline from the stress of be harassed.  I’m currently healthy and I shouldn’t have any problem rolling out my message at a snails pace, if I want.  But I still feel an urgency to get the message out

I really think Christopher Dorner was a man out of time, and out of options.  After reading his manifesto, I think he was an intelligent man who didn’t think he would be alive to take the “slow and study wins the race approach”.  He spoke out against police brutality and he later goes on a killing rampage.  He was out of options.  No one should ever feel that way and backing people into a corner by gangstalking, mobbing and monitoring  until they lash out, doesn’t solve problems It creates them.  If you’ve been told gangstalking is a solution to a problem, don’t believe it…  you’ve been snowed.  You can’t break things to fix things.  When you break people, society doesn’t get better; It gets less open and more fearful.  Who among us doesn’t want society to get better?  Who benefits from gangstalking?  Don’t be part of it.

Thank you for reading my blog.

What does Gangstalking have to do with the California Highway Patrol?

DISCLAIMER ADDED:  MY BLOGS CONTAIN MY OPINIONS ONLY, WHEN I SAY I CAN NOT PROVE SOMETHING, YOU CAN ASSUME I AM STATING MY OPINION.  YOU, OF COURSE ARE WELCOME TO YOUR OWN  OPINIONS.

I can tell you, with confidence that I now know  WHY my husband and I have been relentlessly stalked and harassed for the past 4+ years. I also know WHO is behind it.

In 2009 my husband and I successfully sued the California Highway Patrol for a seemingly paltry sum of less than $500.00.  I knew that they were seriously pissed about it, but I could not have even imagined a program like gangstalking, or that an agency that upholds our laws, could endorse anything like it.  I cannot prove the CHP had anything to do with gangstalking– they are certainly not following us around.  Lackeys do that.  What I can tell you is that it fits the time line and it requires resources to keep this going.

Let me say right up front, I am nervous about discussing this. It is a story that needs to be told. In fact,  I have written about it in many places, all off-line, and shared it with a few select individuals over the years. I’ve wanted to share it, but I know it is not going to be appreciated by the very groups that have endorsed and participated in making my life hell for the last 4 years. (Again,  This is my opinion!)

I guess an escalation of the harassment or difficulty getting my message out there will serve as a confirmation of what I now know. If you believe in gut instinct, intuition or what ever you want to call it, you should know that even though I can’t prove it, I know with every fiber of my being that this is it…. this is the answer to the question that was so important for me to answer.

Many of you already know gangstalking is a government sponsored program. I will try and explain why it took me so long to believe that, given that I already knew what went on between us and the CHP. I don’t want you to think I’m stupid for not figuring it out sooner. The CHP was always one of my main suspects.   The other  possibility was, I suspect a  diversion — but it was a huge one.

I was also probably in denial, because I have always  loved my country. I felt privileged to be born in the United States. I will discuss all that some time down the road.

For now, it is sufficient to say, I feel Betrayed, completely and utterly Betrayed.

And as for the actual stalkers, well they are a diversion too!   The Hash House haraassers (multiple California clubs) continue to treat us like their pet project. The Santa Cruz Chapter operates like a cult, and, as is one of the hallmarks of a cult, they keep their members busy busy busy. They also actively recruit, trying to make stalking  a fun, bonding experience for the group, sucking in young families, and swallowing them whole. (They make them feel “oh so special” , and before long they are crossing moral boundaries and encouraging their children to do the same. It is scary to watch –the recruitersappear to be very good at it.)

The higher ranking hashers are great cheerleaders to get the crews doing what nobody would normally choose to do (sort of like “who wants to sell flowers on the street corner for the Moonies?, Who wants to wait on street corners in case the target turns left there?) The cheerleaders take the plum assignments (like following me out of town to a fancy Napa resort), while the low ranking members wait on the bridge to watch my my husband as he passes by, headed for home (same time every day- tell me that’s not BUSY WORK). The higher hashers are spending a fortune to harass us, so they must be well paid by Uncle Sam. They are not nice people.

If you live in California and you are being Gangstalked —  Check out the photos of your closest hash house harassers. The SF, Monterey, SC, San Diego, Santa Barbara and Long Beach Chapters all have web sites and faces I recognize.  Maybe you’ve seen a few of those faces in your rear view as well.

Even though I can offer no proof that the California Highway Patrol, set the gangstalking of my husband and I in motion, The story I am about to tell can be completely collaborated with accident reports, hospital records, Court documents, an Internal Affairs Investigation, etc.

The following agencys have at least some information about what transpired. Much of it, is probably public record.

CHP Satellite Office, Aptos, CA :(Patrol Division)

CHP Headquarters, Sacramento CA: (Legal Affairs, Risk Management, Internal Affairs, Accounts Payable, Accounts Receivable–Collections/Interceptions)

California Office of the Attorney General

California Franchise Tax Board

California Department of Motor Vehicles

Santa Cruz  Couty Court: Records Division

I’m not revealing our names –not yet, anyway…(and maybe not anybody elses either), but there are enough details that a good investigator shouldn’t have any trouble establishing that my story is true.

Because it is a long complicated story, and it took place over a couple years time, I’ve broken it down into parts and will do a post for each separate section.

Much of it is written already, but not blog ready. I do have a basic outline on how I plan to roll it out. Here is what you can expect:

1. The Accident, The Injury, and The Investigation
2. The Civil Hearing
3. The Criminal Case, and Rules of Court
4. Demands, Collections, and Interceptions
5. Hoops: Preparing To Sue a State Agency
6. Small Claims Court, and Judgement
7. Demands, Collections and Internal Affairs
8. Man Behind the curtain, and the Motion to Vacate
9. Small Claims Court
10. Collections, and another Interception

Stick with me, you are bound to learn things I wish I didn’t Know. I think you will find it all more than a little Disturbing!

 

Justifiably Disturbed by Gang Stalking: Mission Statement

My goal in writing this blog is very specific: I want to garner support and credibility for gangstalking victims, among the unaware public.   Being a victim is bad enough, but having to first explain the crime, and then convince people that it really does happen, is particularly demoralizing. It is like being victimized again by those who would unquestionably support you, if you were the victim of almost any other crime.

If you are a Targeted Individual you already know plenty about skepticism.  Prior to being gangstalked, I can never remember having my credibility, or my version of events being questioned. I am a skeptic myself, but this  type of skepticism is something I was completely unfamiliar with.  I realize skepticism is a practical tool to facilitate the search for the truth. Truth is trump. Doubting that the holocaust ever happened doesn’t make you a healthy skeptic, it makes you uninformed or an idiot. I will consider it a victory when gang stalking awareness has achieved 3 things:

1. Gangstalking becomes a familiar mainstream term, that people equate to Organized Harassment.
2. The unaware public has become aware that it goes on and don’t doubt its veracity any more than they doubt that bullying or genocide are real.
3. Targeted Individuals are recognized as Victims.  Gangstalking is considered a serious, reprehensible crime, and perpetrators are criminals. responsible and held accountable for their behavior.  Victims will not need to convince anybody it happens; everyone will be familiar with it.

It was really shocking for me to realize that people, friends, family. neighbors, etc. were skeptical of my accounts of being followed and harassed by strangers.  All my years of being truthful and stable was not enough, to overcome the doubt that strangers would actually do this to someone they didn’t know.

As I said in an earlier entry, these strangers are exhibiting focussed hostile behavior towards you that is usually reserved for vendettas of a very personal nature. You lose support when you cannot come up with the answer to the question “WHY?” “Who would put this much effort into it?” The skepticism is understandable,  because it seems to defy logic. At first you can hardly believe it yourself. Your world is turned upside down and you feel disoriented, shocked even.  Realizing that everything is different then you thought it was  is easy to resist and hard to accept.

Early on, I remember reading information by other victims of gangstalking, and feeling skeptical about some of the experiences they  described. I was appalled that people were treating me with skepticism — but at the same time I was doubting what other victims (credible victims) were reporting. I remember reading Mark Rich’s “The Hidden Evil” on the web (before he had compiled it into a book). I never have doubted that he is a targeted Individual. Not then. Not Now. He is the real deal. But I was new to being gangstalked and I hadn’t experienced how pervasive it is–or how money (or lack of it) really is no object.
Mark Rich wrote of a trip that he took to visit someone (a sister, I think) in another state. He got on a plane and 2 of his stalkers boarded the plane with him. I didn’t believe it. I thought the stress of being stalked had caused him to see stalkers where there were none. Today… there is absolutely no doubt in my mind that his stalkers got on the plane with him, just as he described.

Eleanor White has a pamphlet that explains what is happening to us, It is a tool for victims to give to people who have never heard of gang stalking before. Because, as she explains, people who have not experienced what we have… are not ready for the truth. In essence, they can’t handle the truth. It doesn’t mean that the bystanding unaware public will never be able to handle the truth. What it means is that, the truth is something so out of their realm of experience that they need to have it spoon fed to them or they will choke on it and discount you as a Nutter. (I’ve been playing around with British Slang lately)  This spoon-feeding approach advocated by Eleanor is helpful. Her pamphlet really does help lower the credibility hurdle. I’ve used it with positive results. But I do have a less rigid approach.

The most important thing to me is to present the information in a way that is credible, even if what I am describing seems absolutely incredible to the uninitiated. Gangstalking takes place in the midst of the UNAWARE PUBLIC. They don’t see a thing–but they could, and would, if they were aware of it and/or looking for it. Exposure will take a lot of the power away from gangstalking activities. Getting the word out is the best way to stop it. I really believe that. That is my goal. That’s what I want. I want to see the rock these criminals are hiding under, overturned. I want to put an end to the cloak of plausible deniability and to them flying under the radar.

I hate having my credibility questioned. My personal feeling is that I have to temper my words so they don’t contribute to the unaware public associating the term gangstalking with anything other than what it is. A lot of the disinformation out there, attempts to paint it as some sort of fringe phenomenon. It isn’t. Gangstalking is organized and meticulously thought out and planned. It is not being perpetrated by humans with reptilian DNA, aliens, Satan or the Occult.

The hocus pocus fringe theories are put forth predominately by gangstalkers in an attempt to make victims look crazy. The fact that they have been so prolific about it has actually helped us, by spreading the term.  The term Gangstalking seems more common and main stream today than it was, even two years ago. They have done their part to help spread the term “gangstalking”. I expect it to become even more common with time.

Next post will address the many comments I have received.

Gangstalking: 2 Years Later

It has really been almost 2 years since I published the last of 10 posts about being gang stalked and time hasn’t exactly stood still.  The bad news  (I hate to report it to anyone who is a more recent victim) is that it continues, unabated, at least for my husband and I.   That’s the bad news, and actually the worst news I have to report.  I read and continue to research everything I can about the topic.  I also have continued to write, although not in a public forum.  We have learned and continue to learn ways to deal with our gangstalkers and what they can and cannot do.

They have not rendered us homeless, penniless or any of the other claims made on various web pages (written or hyped by stalkers.) They have managed to isolate us from our neighbors, many who now participate in the harassment campaign; but our families, while not exactly supportive don’t  seem to have joined ranks with the dupes.

Like everything else in life, there are good and bad sides to everything.  The best part has been the laughs that they have given us with their awkward antics, to make sure they get our attention. When things backfire on them, and they are clearly feeling foolish, it’s a hoot. Sometimes things we do, make them change tactics. This is a victory for us, and anything that makes things better for us and worse for them, needs to be shared

I really prefer not to dwell on negativity, which is part of the reason I stopped writing: it is such a complete downer to write about daily harassment by strangers.  I also hated giving people who are invading my life, even more information about what I think and feel.  A blog that deals with gangstalking is not going to be happy and fun.  And our lives are about so much more than being gangstalked. but that is what this blog is all about.  That means that I am writing about a narrow range of really nasty, unpleasant things that don’t define us and that are not of our choosing or making.  It is a bummer to dwell on unpleasantness day in and day out.  I am  natuarally optimistic and try to focus on good things, and let the bad roll off me.

I really don’t get depressed, but that said, gangstalking is discouraging and it wears on you. Its sad to know that other people are so easily manipulated and immoral.  That bothers me every bit as much as being the actual focus of such stupidity and cruelty.  When you read about gangstalking tactics you may be fooled into thinking that they have more power than they do.  They want you to think that.  They alter their methods to capitalize on any fears you already have.

I’ll tell you right now, this garbage you read about people killing themselves over being gangstalked is not something gangstalkers have ANY control over..  I’ve told everyone in my life since I’ve been 10 years old (when my Dad was explaining the attempted suicide of a relative to me) that I would NEVER commit suicide.  If I’m dead and somebody calls it a suicide….. they better take another look.  It’s not me… and I’m pretty damn sure its not my husband….  (who, actually can’t believe anyone would take gangstalkers that seriously– or would be ungracious enough to take a self inflicted exit strategy, without doing other victims the courtesy of helping a few stalkers through the door, before doing so.)

We (my husband and I) have learned a lot during nearly 4 years of non stop harassment.  We also deal with it quite differently from each other. and possibly from other targets.  There are advantages to having another person close to you, know and understand, (and most importantly believe) the reality that being gangstalked inflicts on you.  My husband is much more confrontational with gangstalkers than I am.  I avoid them; he often seeks them out appearing where they meet (just a random tourist snapping pictures-ya know) because it is quite clear that it makes them uncomfortable.  I worry that his obnoxious behavior towards them alienates people who are not (yet) on board with them.  He worries that I have become a hermit.

Becoming a hermit, has made the stalkers put on exhibitions in front of our house and go to great lengths to get my attention.  We record it all on 2 cameras that catch an ongoing “Parade of Idiots”.

We rent an old Victorian house 2 blocks from the beach.  built long before the sidewalk or setback requirements which create a buffer from house and sidewalk.  The side of our house can be touched without ever stepping off the sidewalk and it is a very busy sidewalk, indeed..  We live in close proximity  to several bars and a couple restaurants  (we can actually see some of them from the porch). We have always had a stream of drunks and other idiots during the summer months, but now its a year round parade of even bigger idiots, including some of our formerly normal (and friendly) neighbors.

Anyone who is gangstalked is going to feel better after I tell you about the antics of our own personal “PARADE OF IDIOTS”.  Sometime soon, I’ll get into the “Tourettes Twins” the “Warthog”  “Chisel Face” and the drunks who pretend to pass out and wait to be revived by emergency vehicles that hang out with lights flashing long after their downed drunk has sobered up (within minutes).  I do not need to leave my house to get a show.  It is literally non stop entertainment where I live.  There are the parents who have instructed their kids to scream and make a scene and actually come up the stairs onto our porch while they pretend not to notice.  Those same parents let their children come into contact with the human pee on the fence and sidewalk and the dog feces that contaminate the area, courtesy of their fellow stalkers.  Some of them break out the ice chest and have lunch right there, on the grass median between the sidewalk and the street.  They may leave their trash, but they are loudly sitting on something much worse that the stalkers before them left. I’ll tell you about the futility of the CAR DOOR SLAM PARTY that happens every night, all night.  That’s what harassment looks like.  Sometimes, it does get to you…. other times its a free front seat ticket to the show, a show that makes me grin and shake my head that people would actually participate in it.  Who are these idiots?  Are people really that stupid?  No doubt about it. (image found on REDDIT).

 

The 3AM car-door-slam-party! Yoo Hoo!!!

Some people don’t believe that stalkers would USE their own children to further their agenda.  This little anecdote should blow that theory out of the water:  I was sitting in my living room one day and I hear 3 little kids having an argument right outside my window.  These kids are about 5, 6 and the oldest might have been 7 or 8.  They are arguing over a house, which house,  specifically.  The one little kid says “NO, Not Here…. Its that house…. over there.”  The other kid says “No, I know I’m right… This is the house!”   It goes on for a bit,  getting pretty heated and they stomp off.  They are back less than 5  minutes later.  They approach the house and one of them starts bouncing a basketball.  The little one starts screaming in that earsplitting little kid way (the one that makes you secretly glad to know his parents get to enjoy it in frequently, and in closed spaces) the oldest one starts pounding his skateboard against the front steps.  It was so funny and so ludicrous to think of those little kids running home to get confirmation from Mom and Dad about the correct house to behave so incorrectly in front of…I laughed my ass off and thought what I always think:  Model Parents, Right There!

 

Model Parents, Right There!

above image found on Pinterest

 

 

Respect for others is learned early.  Or it’s not.  Do these parents really think their children are going to  respect them when they grow up? Gangstalkers treat us without any respect at all…. but for those with children…. they are going to know what if feels like to be disrespected.  It is inevitable.  And guess what… it is even worse when disrespect is personal.  Your children will one day treat you like garbage– and guess what?  YOU DESERVE IT!

 

Now,  I want to end this post with something that is more positive.  When I go somewhere stalkers like to impede my progress.  They block doorways, rush ahead in line and then move extremely slow through the check out process.  They also like to create traffic delays.  It used to bug me.  Now I have a different mind set. I never go anywhere in a hurry.  I have the luxury of not having to.  Every time they delay me by 5 minutes, I figure it took many stalkers much more than 5 minutes each just to facilitate my delay.  And as I wait in line, traffic, or whatever…  I think to myself…. I will gladly give up 5 minutes or however long it takes, because I know that it took each and every one of the harassment detail for the day, the amount of time they are costing me,  plus considerably more time to get in place (a place they wouldn’t even be, and would probably rather not be, were it not my destination).  They go where I decide to go, and when I decide to go.  They are giving up their time in droves to take up a little of my time.  And, there are many  more of them.  Who is really inconveniencing who here?  You do the math.  They are really the ones doing all the WAITING.  They wait for me to leave the house, Wait for me to shop, to pay and to do whatever I have to do anyway. They may delay me, but each and every one of them has individually spent more time than they are costing me—That’s sweet…  And I, for one, am willing to give up a little of my day for the pleasure of  making stalkers wait and wait and wait.     The fact that they are all too willing to do it, means they really do suck at math!

 

 

 

 

 

 

Santa Cruz Cop Gets Played by Gangstalkers

The Santa Cruz Police Officer who responded to the traffic accident, that could have crippled my husband (see my last post,) got it wrong on his report. The report stated that the accident was caused by my husbands failure to yield the right of way, while entering  a traffic lane.

I am certain that the three gangstalkers who acted as witnesses are the reason the patrol officer, wrote a report that did not reflect the actual circumstances that led to the accident.  I think the witnesses followed a script.  I think the script used language and words that were deliberately chosen because they were powerful enough to influence the police, and keep real  witnesses to the accident at bay.   CAREFULLY CHOSEN WORDS CAN BE EXTREMELY POWERFUL. In this situation, they influenced the perception of the responding officer,  and ultimately shaped that officer’s written accident report and findings.

Evidence for this is found in the behavior and words of  all three of the witnesses.   These three witnesses, posing as strangers to each other and the driver of the Jeep.  All  used the exact same words, alternating between them and repeating . “I saw everything! I’ll be your witness!”.  They said it loud and often.  This began seconds after impact and  continued while the paramedics tended to my husband, and even while the officer interviewed the parties involved in the accident.  These gangstalkers are into NLP stuff.  It is basically using the words to influence the mind.  NLP goes hand in hand with hypnosis and the “power of suggestion”.  When it is non consensual and used to influence or control someones thoughts or behavior, it is unethical, but…. for gangstalkers, ethics isn’t really a concern.  Many NLP practitioners, no doubt, think applying NLP ethically, severely limits its power.  More info on NLP here.

When the cop took the witness statements, all three witness also used the exact same words to describe the accident. Those words are what made it onto the actual police report.  interestingly enough, the report references the three witness accounts,  but gives them one voice , saying  “all witness agreed that it would not have been possible for the Jeep to have avoided hitting the motorcyclist” .  Even more interesting is that the report only identifies one of the witnesses by name. Remember, these people want to remain anonymous. We would love to know their names. Why the other two names don’t appear anywhere on the report, seems a little sloppy to me. But maybe two of the witnesses slipped off, (planned, no doubt) before the officer could get their personal information.  .

Their real names are important to us. It helps us to connect dots, and often leads to the real names of other gangstalkers, and the groups they are members of. The connections are often family members who we recognize from times they followed us.  Sometimes it leads full circle, and connects back to a possible motive for targeting us.  Here is an example:

My awareness of  gangstalking started right after I threatened to sue Carrington College, in San Jose,  and told the dean, I thought their accreditation should be rescinded. I did this after an ugly experience where in my opinion (disclaimer:  my opinion, okay)  they  failed to deliver on their promises, had behaved unethically. and basically ripped me off and then tried to extort even more money out of me, after that.    The motive for my personal gangstalking is not known, but we do have a couple of theories.  Carrington College is one of those theories.  I have written about them at length, and will post it in the future.

The real name of one gangstalker,  led us to a relative of hers, who has also followed and harassed us.  This relative has a connection to Carrington College; so it lends support to one of our theories,  about why we were targeted. It’s not conclusive, but it’s another brick in the wall, so to speak. It also explains the importance of knowing the real names of these people.

We have often joked that we’re tempted to deliberately ram a car into one of the a$$hole stalkers, just so we could find out who they were from the police report. How disappointing to see only one of the three witnesses actually named on the report.

Okay, back to the accident:

 

The gangstalkers sprang into action, the moment the accident happened, to protect their fellow gangstalker from legal trouble. They had a job to do and they did it just as they planned and practiced for. They acted just like professional con artists.

The cop actually had everything he needed to ascertain exactly how the crash happened. But he also had to contend with the testimony of three lying witness, determined to influence the outcome.

The gangstalker who was involved in the accident, was clearly shaken up.  (my husband wondered at the time if maybe he didn’t have insurance, a license or had fake plates, because he was so nervous acting.)  My husband and the other driver both told the truth.   Inexplicably, neither one of their statements actually appears correctly in the report.

The Jeep’s driver told the officer that he “punched it around traffic to make the green left turn light.”   (Him and my husband were interviewed together.) This admission is found nowhere in the report and is extremely important. It was not part of the witness testimony, probably because it alters the perception of the driver as blameless .and in need of three impartial witnesses to protect HIS interests ( as evidenced by  “I’ll be YOUR witness”.)

My husband told the officer he was about to make a left into southbound traffic and he was looking right to make sure it was clear, when he was hit.  He says he never saw the car coming because there was no reason to look in that direction.  The report says my husband was looking at the driver when he hit him. That must have come from the witnesses.

Neither of my husbands statements are all that crucial, to understanding what happened, but it is worth noting that the phony witnesses statements are the only ones that appear on the report, and they were lies.

To understand how the accident really happened only required a few pieces of information, all of it readily available.

The Santa Cruz Officer who responded to the accident knew (or was told) the following:

1. The spot where the impact of the accident occurred ( at the very beginning of the Northbound left turn lane)

2. The Northbound lanes that proceed straight through,were stopped, backed up, and waiting for the red light to turn green.

3. My husband had maneuvered his bike through the two lanes of stopped traffic to get to the spot where the impact occurred. (he admitted this.  and it’s the only thing the witness did not lie about.)

4. The driver of the jeep had “punched it around the traffic to make the green left hand turn light.“

That leaves only one crucial question:   How did the driver of the jeep arrive at the spot where the accident happened?  HOW?

The traffic wasn’t moving in the northbound lanes, backed up well before the left turn lane began, effectively blocking access to the northbound turn lane. The jeep couldn’t have come from the gas station, squeezing between the cars backed up, waiting for the light, like my husbands motorcycle did.

There was only one way the driver could have gone around the traffic to reach the place where the left turn lane actually began, and the accident happened. The driver of the Jeep had to have been going North, traveling the wrong direction, in the Southbound lane, to circumvent the northbound traffic that was  stopped at the light.

That explains why my husband says he was looking right before turning into the southbound lane, and never saw the jeep. The jeep driver hit my husband broadside, unable to stop. Witness and the report said there would have been no way for the driver to have avoided the motorcyclist. My husband thinks there were probably skid marks because the jeep driver locked his brakes in an attempt to avoid the accident.

I disagree, about this being and unavoidable accident for the jeeps driver.  What if the jeep driver had not been going the wrong way on Ocean street, clearly against the law, in the first place?

Or try this thought experiment:

if my husband had been a couple of seconds faster, or the jeep driver, just a bit slower, they would have had a head on collision in the southbound lane. The jeep driver would have been going the wrong direction (north in a southbound lane) and clearly be at fault for the accident. The cause of the accident was set in motion prior to the impact, regardless of fault. If it had happened a couple of seconds earlier it would have happened in the southbound lane, instead of the start of the northbound left turn lane. It would have changed nothing about the jeep drivers actions. So how could it change his responsibility for the accident, once he is in motion?

Feel free to use the comment section, if you find fault with my logic here.

 

Since the jeep driver was already in motion, doesn’t he assume some responsibility, even if the impact takes place as he is illegally pulling into the northbound lane, instead of still traveling the wrong way to get to the point of impact?

I don’t know if what my husband did was legal, but I am certain what the driver of the jeep did, was NOT LEGAL. Yet, my husband who,  got broadsided by the jeep was found at fault, instead of the Jeep’s driver.

How does a police officer trained in accident investigation get it wrong, despite having all the evidence needed, at the scene, to get it right?

He was up against pros.

 

I think being trained to spot gangstalkers and witness who are not just lying, but using the same words and phrases to do so, would help them do their jobs better.

This isn’t a one time thing. These gangstalkers cause lots of accidents. They will do the same thing to you or anybody they hit or run over, if they continue to get away with it.

That witness testimony kept the cop from asking that all important question. HOW DID THE JEEP DRIVER ARRIVE AT THE POINT OF IMPACT? The answer to that would have shifted blame, and should not have been missed.  In this case the witness testimony was so persistent, so adamant, and so unanimous, that, that alone was given enough weight to determine the cause of the accident.

Witness testimony should only be used as a tool for determining what happened to cause the accident.  It shouldn’t be allowed to lead the officer away from the truth.   Officers need  training to see the signs that these people are running a game.  Training is the only way to keep from getting snowed by them.  There are certainly signs.

These witnesses behaved strangely, and the police department should train their officers to recognize the signs that signal collusion and gangstalking tactics are being used to influence the outcome of an investigation.

There isn’t really anybody at an accident scene that can legitimately make the claim. “I saw everything” .  (You would need an overhead view.) This accident had three of them.  Nowhere on the report does it state where the witness were when the accident happened.  It’s also missing, just like two of their names.

These witnesses kept saying. “I’ll be your witness” repeatedly to the jeep driver”. Clearly, not unbiased, and again, an odd thing to have all three witnesses say repeatedly.

And maybe the cop should have noticed how all three witness avoided eye contact with the motorcyclist,  they told there stories without a glance in his direction, usually keeping their backs to him. Odd behavior all the way around.  Of course the officer didn’t actually get to  see the strangest behavior, which happened before he arrived. All three witnesses stepped over and ignored a bleeding man in the street, and convened a pow wow at the window of the unhurt jeep driver.

My complaint is not so much about the officer, as the departments failure to train their officers to go with the evidence, instead of allowing witness testimony alone to determine fault. Officers should be on the lookout for witness testimony that is all seeing, all knowing, and told verbatim by different witnesses.  It’s classic gangstalker.

The report should have identified all three witnesses by name, and given their location at the time they witnessed the accident. It was incomplete. And even more important…it was wrong.

The gangstalkers are here. they are working Santa Cruz, and they are working Santa Cruz PD.  It’s not too late for Santa Cruz Police Department  to get it right, by training officers to recognize gangstalkers in action.

 

My Husband Almost Lost His Leg To a Gangstalker

My husband came close to losing his leg to a gangstalker less than two months ago. It happened on Ocean Stree, in Santa Cruz on a bright sunny day. Although some Gangstalkers have reportedly run into their targets on purpose, this really was an accident. A foreseeable accident, but an accident just the same.

If you think this happened to my husband, because he is a target, you should know that it could easily (and often does) happen to anybody in the vicinity of gangstalkers, as they go about harassing their target by car. They drive like maniacs, taking whatever chances are necessary to keep their target in site and to create an environment of unrelenting harassment.

They cut off parking lots; they go the wrong direction on one way streets. They periodically exit a freeway from the fast lane, making an abrupt right angle turn, cutting across all lanes to scare their target and force them to brake suddenly. They’ve done this to me, going 60mph, and pity the innocent person who could have been behind me. (This tactic is going to be covered more thoroughly in future post.) It’s an intimidation move, meant to let you know they have been right in front of you for the last few miles.  Box maneuvers happen frequently, on  freeways using several vehicles to keep the target (and anybody who is unfortunate enough to be behind the group) , from speeding up or exiting the freeway.  They are dangerous. It might seem like they are playing a game, but the stakes could be your life or your leg.

Here’s my husbands leg, in pictures taken the day of the accident and over the following 2 weeks. I have no doubt that if my husband had lost his leg or been permanently crippled, the gangstalkers would have viewed it as a happy accident.  If an innocent bystander lost his leg it would probably be viewed as unfortunate, but just the cost of doing business.

I’m going to describe the accident in detail, because it is important for realizing how the Santa Cruz officer was taken in by the Gangstalkers.  Gangstalkers never work solo, when stalking their targets. They operate using the “safety in numbers” principal.  If one of them gets in trouble, the others spring into action to deflect any negative consequences. that might befall any member of the team.  In the case of police involvement or an auto accident, the job of the rest of the team is to act as witnesses, vouching for the member of their team who has earned unwanted attention.

The gangstalkers, posing as witnesses, can rightly be compared to an experienced team of   grifters, smoothly pulling off a complex con on a mark.   In my husbands accident,  the ultimate goal was to make sure the stalker who hit him, was not held responsible for the accident.  To achieve this goal the Gangstalkers had to work two separate marks:  the police officer who responded to the scene, and  ultimately wrote the erroneous police report; and several real witness, that were just feet away, at the moment of impact.

The Gangstalkers are able to pull this off, by using psychological tricks to create an alternate reality, which enables them to suck the unsuspecting into the lie. You’ll be able to see exactly how it works, when I describe the actual scene that began to unfold,  seconds after the accident.

I am not holding my husband blameless for the accident. He should have spoken up at the time.  He felt outnumbered, he wasn’t sure if his actions were entirely legal. and he may have been in shock. At the very least, he was shook up, in pain, and not thinking clearly.

I spoke with my insurance agent, who informed me there can be degrees of fault assigned to any accident. Insurance companies regularly use these findings when figuring how to proportion payout, in an accident, where the actions of both parties are considered a contributing factor. Even if my husbands actions were not strictly legal, I think you will have a hard time assigning the blame ratio at 100 to 0, in the Jeep driver’s favor, once you know what happened.

Gangstalking and Predictive Policing: A Perfect Pair

Gangstalking and Predictive Policing: A Perfect Pair

At the same meeting mentioned in the last post, my husband spoke with Santa Cruz Mayor, Don Lane. My husband emailed him several months back, about our harassment and the lackluster response from local police.

We have had some success in getting a police response by contacting members of the Santa Cruz City Council. They responded quickly, pressuring the police to “take care of the problem.” Apparently the city council has the ear of the Chief, because their intervention generates a proactive effort on the part of the PD.

If you are being gangstalked and your police department has been less than helpful, you might consider going to your city council We were just reaching out for help, and didn’t realize that this is akin to going over the heads of the PD. They really don’t appreciate it. It is probably better to work with them, if you can. Contacting the the PD and using the cc (carbon copy) for the city council is more respectful. This makes the City Council aware of the problem, and gives the police an opportunity to act without prodding. I would try that first….but truthfully, my husband doesn’t usually ask for my opinion before dashing off the occasional pointed or inflammatory email. There are, after all, two people being gangstalked in our house. Keep in mind, the dynamic between city government and the police department may be different where you live.

Because of the City Council’s intervention, we were given an opportunity to present our case to the Deputy Chief, who was nice enough, but probably didn’t bother to read the detailed incident report I gave him. (I say this, because a week later he appeared to not be familiar with any of the details, when I spoke to him on the phone.)

What the deputy chief actually did, was give me the BIG BRUSHOFF (details to be covered in another post.) I didn’t even realize it at the time, because the man is very good at his job. In hindsight, i’m actually amazed at how smoothly he went about not helping me at all. His job was never about helping me. The job of a Deputy Chief is to help his Chief. In this case, the Chief was prodded by the city council to “take care of the problem”. I’m a little slow, on the whole chain of command thing… but now that my myopia has been corrected, by the virtue of hindsight… I realize that “MY problem” was not “THE problem” for the Chief. My husband and I were “THE problem”. I may not have considered the Deputy Chief to be very helpful, but i am sure the Chief is very pleased with him. If the chief paid his salary, he deserves a raise.

Anyone who is familiar with gangstalking, already knows Santa Cruz PD has admitted (apparently the first PD in the country, to openly do so) that gangstalking exists, and that it is a growing problem. The original story aired on our local TV News station, KION, where a SCPD spokesperson called it “bullying on steroids.” The Deputy Chief told me, he was not surprised by the gangstalking activity that we have experienced, remarking that he had “seen it all before.”

Judging by the thousands (from all over the world) of references to the SCPD’s public admission, regarding gangstalking, there is a general perception that SCPD is an enlightened and progressive police department. Logic dictates that a department that identifies a particular crime as a “growing problem” should be working on solutions to nip it in the bud. After all, you always hear that the first step, is admitting there is a problem. Logic also dictates that advance knowledge of gangstalking should put an end to the credibility hurdle victims have had to overcome. Right? Uh….not so fast.

There appears to be a serious breakdown in communication between the people who are in charge, and the officers who work for them, patrolling the streets. Every single SCPD officer who has responded to our calls, has told us they have never heard of gangstalking, or anything like it. (Maybe they watch KSBW instead of KION. )The moment we tell them we are being harassed by complete strangers, and that we do not know WHY they are doing this, we are treated to barely disguised skepticism.

You have to wonder why the Patrol Officers are unaware of it, when their bosses have gone on record acknowledging that it is a growing problem, Is it a matter of scarce resources, and low priority? I have NO idea. But this cavalier attitude is exactly what fuels the belief, by many victims, that law enforcement is part of the problem. Unlike some victims, I don’t think law enforcement or the U.S. government, is officially complicit in gangstalking. But, CLEARLY …they don’t seem to be part of the solution! It is extremely upsetting to be treated like you are imagining intense harassment, because the bosses haven’t bothered to tell the responding officers that this crime is a real crime with real victims.

That said, I do want to say that there is one Lieutenant on the SCPD, who has always treated us respectfully, never expressed skepticism at our reports, and really tried to help. My guess is that there is only so much one man can do, in a culture where those in charge have refused to do even the bare minimum, to stop these criminals.

When the patrol officers, who interact with the public, say they have never heard of Gangstalking (a crime that is PURPOSELY executed in a way that invites skepticism) upper management (sorry for the civilian term) really has failed to do the bare minimum. They have failed to share their admitted knowledge of the crime, with those in the best position to observe it, and catch the perpetrators in the act. Nobody is going to put any effort into solving a crime they don’t think is real.

By not even doing the bare minimum, the SCPD has further victimized us, by fostering an environment which encourages patrol officers (through ignorance) to disregard our pleas for help, view our accounts with barely concealed skepticism, and allow organized criminals to operate unchecked.

The first step in reconciling this problem is for the entire department to know what has already been shared with the public: Gangstalking is a crime that is happening in our area; it is growing, because technology has made it easier than ever.

When everybody is on the same page, and gangstalking is recognized for the serious crime that it is, the police department should make a commitment to eradicating it, or at least, treat it like other serious crimes.

Being the first PD in the country to take a stand against Gangstalking , is about as progressive as it gets. And how about this for the predictive policing agenda: I tell you where I’m going….and you predict the place and time where police will find gangstalkers harassing and violating the civil rights of an innocent citizen of Santa Cruz, as well as inconveniencing every other person in the vicinity (which can’t be avoided, and is of absolutely no concern to gangstalkers.)

There are rough estimates that put the number of gangstalking victims in the U.S at around 500.000. That is half a millon people who desperately need a progressive police department be the first to take up our fight against gangstalking. Why not the Santa Cruz Police Department?

Regardless of the position SCPD ultimately takes on gangstalking, there should be protocols in place for handling reports made by victims of it. “Act skeptical”, should be shelved, despite its long reign of popularity. It really is unhelpful in every imaginable way. It is a know the police encounter a lot of liars. I really wish the truth wasn’t so hard to believe. But thats how gangstalking works. That’s why it works. Skepticism is only possible, if you choose ignorance (which requires no effort). In my opinion, gangstalking has no informed skeptics.

In predictive policing, isn’t the goal to prevent a crime altogether or catch perpetrators in the act of commiting crimes? Drug deals take place out in the open every day, right under the noses of an ubsuspecting public. Should Gangstalking take place right under the noses of an unsuspecting patrol division? Police see crimes that the ordinary citizens routinely overlook. Training is what makes the difference.

Training officers to spot and recognize gangstalking, while its happening would not take a big time committment. Gangstalking is a smart crime that frequently takes place in public. It is subtle and invisible to the untrained eye. Officers study human beings, they can be trained easier than most people to detect the subtle signs of gangstalking activity. I can guarantee that the first time an officer spots it and recognizes it for what it is, it will be like ringing a bell– it can’t be un-rung.

.

In the next post, I will tell you how the Gangstalkers ran a con on a Santa Cruz Police Officer, responding to a traffic accident. They absolutely influenced his investigation. The story should illustrate the importance” of educating the local police department on how to spot Gangstalkers and catch them in the act of breaking the law. They aren’t just hurting us. They are a menace to the entire community; and currently Santa Cruz is hosting a large active community of Gangstalkers. Anyone who wants to see gangstalking isn’t going to lack opportunities. I am going to do what I can in this blog to educate people on how to observe gangstalking in action. And how easy it is to overlook it.