I don’t need to convince other victims of Gangstalking that my husband and I are stalked everywhere we go, harassed daily by numerous complete strangers or that we are under surveillance 24/7. Other victims already know all about it. We see things that other people don’t.
Raising awareness about gangstalking means helping the unaware public to see what it is, that victims see. If anyone but the targeted victim can see the harassment, gangstalking loses a lot of its power. Seeing is believing, or so the saying goes. The reverse of that is also true. This means people tend to resist believing in what they don’t see. The problem with this is, you look with your eyes, but you see with your brain. Just because you don’t see my Gangstalkers harassing me right in front of you, doesn’t mean you can’t!
Everybody can be trained to pay attention and be more observant. That said, perception is a funny thing. Our eyes take in vast amounts of information. The brain filters, and processes all those visual cues, as well as input from our other sensory organs. Our amazing brains, instantaneously, sift, sort, compare, compartmentalize, organize, and prioritize those sensory cues to make sense of the world around us, orienting us in our physical space and determining appropriate responses to the current environment. Much of this is hardwired, such as the tendency for the brain to try to find patterns in those visual cues. Presumably the ability to pick out a predator, camouflaged against a backdrop of jungle foliage, was a beneficial skill for our ancestors to have. It could mean the difference between having dinner and being dinner.
If the brain perceives a threat in the proximal environment, it understandably, gives it top priority. Sensory cues determined by the brain to be high priority, get our attention. It is the high priority cues that become conscious thoughts; those conscious thoughts get stored in short-term memory. Top priority events also become conscious thoughts, but they get stored in long-term memory. This explains why unimportant or trivial events are soon forgotten, while significant events are retained for life.
What we actually see is heavily influenced by the sum of our personal experiences. How well we pay attention, and what it is that we pay attention to, are skills, and, as such, they improve with practice. Take a minute and look at the video below.
You are asked to do a simple task: Count how many times a ball is passed back and forth, between players. Despite the fact that every pass is done right in front of you, where you can see it, people often don’t get the answer right, because it requires undivided attention – something modern multitaskers don’t do enough of.
Turn on the volume so you can hear the instructions. Be sure to remember your score when you finish watching.
I have an analogy to explain why two people in the same environment might not see the same thing :
Two women spend the day together at a small, but busy, public beach.
At the end of the day each woman is asked to discuss the dogs they saw during the 6 hours they spent at the beach.The first woman has cats. She loves her cats but doesn’t have much use for dogs. She doesn’t dislike dogs but she didn’t grow up with dogs and she lives in an apartment where they aren’t allowed. Her sister’s boyfriend has a dog, but she doesn’t see it often; that’s really the only dog she knows. When it comes to dogs, she is indifferent.
The second woman was savagely bit by a neighbor’s dog when she was five and she still has the physical scars. She doesn’t have a dog, she is afraid of them. She knows lots of people who have dogs, but she doesn’t visit them; she wouldnt: they have dogs. Her entire life she has had dog lovers trying to convince her that she has nothing to fear from dogs. They go on ad nauseum about their precious pooches, showing her pictures, like they were children, or even worse, begging her to pet them or interact with them. She is definitely not indifferent to dogs.
There were 24 dogs at the off leash beach, during the six hours the women spent there. When asked to discuss the dogs they saw that day, as you might imagine, the woman give very different answers.
The first woman said she saw dogs at the beach but she can’t really remember how many or what kind. She hardly noticed them. But she does remember there was one dog that ran past their blanket, chasing after a stick. She remembers it was big but she doesn’t remember much about how it looked. What she does remember is that the guy throwing the stick was really good-looking.
The second woman not only remembers the dogs, she can describe most of them. Surprisingly, she knows the breeds of several of them. She can tell you which ones were on leash, because, she says they were running wild. She can describe almost all of them, right down to their sizes and whether they obeyed their respective owners, or not. She formed opinions about what she perceived to be the temperaments of some of the doges. Additionally she, could practically map out the particular spot where the dogs and their owners had set up for the day, relative to their own spot on the sand. She says there were dogs running loose, fighting with each other, not obeying their owners and completely out of control, and that it went on all day long. She adds that because of the “dog problem”, she’ll never go back to that particular beach again.
There is no doubt that the same dogs and the same women were all on the beach at the same time. But what they actually saw at the beach that day is so dissimilar that it is hard to believe they were together.
They both had the same sensory input, but they perceived it quite differently. The brain will always give priority to a perceived, implied or potential threat. Gangstalking is just such a threat. For the record, viscous dogs have far better manners than gang stalkers. A dog does not attack out of malice.
Gangstalkers, on the other hand conspire, premeditate and proceed with an intent to harm another person. There is nothing innocent or excusable about the crime of gangstalking OR the people who take part in it.
Before a victim is aware of any gangstalking activity, these criminals have already been covertly stalking, observing, and collecting publicly and privately available data about their target. They’ve already invaded their victims privacy, using available technology, regardless whether it is legal or not.
It is only after this phase that they unleash the hounds. or dupes. or rank and file gangstakers,. or cult followers, or brainwashed devotees, or hash house harassers…. or what ever you want to call people who will leap from the toilet at a moments notice if you suddenly leave your house, so they can stalk you. (That thought alone, is one of the things that makes it so satisfying to take a leisurely trip, by car around the block, one time, before going back inside.) Remember, its not the smart ones who are actually doing the following and harassing.
During the reconnaissance phase, I went about my business just like every other unaware person out there. I don’t doubt that they were there, I just didn’t see them. During this covert phase they are figuring out what your personal triggers are. What is it that bugs you? Is it traffic? Is it waiting in line? Is it rude people? Is it a particular stereo type…. homeless people, people from a particular ethnic group, gays, bible thumpers, bad parents, screaming children, polititians, people who leave trash in your yard? What ever it is, that personally irritates you is fair game. The harassment is personalized and tailored to play out in a public setting where only the players know who the actors are OR even that there are actors.
Then they start to pester you; if something doesn’t get your attention, they move on to the next offensive behavior on the list. The gangstalkers in the field pass on what they learn (i.e. what works on you) and they adapt, until they have your undivided attention. There is no shortage of the rude behaviors that multiple minds on a mission to annoy, can come up with.
When you first realize people are deliberately harassing you it is upsetting and unnerving. Just like the woman bitten by the dog, Gangstalkers get your attention because they are hostile, and they are a threat. If I didn’t notice them, my brain would not doing the job of prioritizing threats and making me acutely aware of their presence, despite all the other sensory stimuli my eyes and ears are taking in. Retail stores are filled with sites, colors, sounds; every product is placed to attract your attention. The unaware person is like the first girl on the beach. The victim is like the second girl at the beach. But the perceived threat is much more real when it deliberately seeks you out. Unlike the gangstalkers, the dogs were not at the beach BECAUSE the woman was there. Gangstalkers, on the other hand are at the same place you are, BECAUSE you are there. Planning and Intent raise the stakes and increase the threat. And what threatens us, gets our attention.
Are gang stalkers a real threat or just perceived as one? Put it this way, when you are stalked or harassed it gets your attention, and it makes you notice things you would have overlooked in the past. Hyper-vigilance is a hard wired survival response when threatened. Gang Stalking is no joke.
Fact based evidence, proving a Gangstalking Program is ongoing and currently active can be found at the appropriately named, gangstalkingismurder.com The site is extremely well documented with affidavits, government responses to FOIA requests, and main stream news reports on the topic.
Gangstalking really is murder…. I’d say that’s a threat. I will explain why I think that this is fair and appropriate assessment of actual intent behind gangstalking in another post.
The purpose of today’s post was to convince you that you do not see EVERYTHING that goes on around you. Hopefully I’ve done that… but my ultimate goal is to open eyes. I want the unaware public to see what actually goes on around me and other victims of Gangstalking.
Justifiably Disturbed by Gangstalking 