Gangstalkers Are NOT Invisible!!

I don’t need to convince other victims of Gangstalking that my husband and I are stalked everywhere we go, harassed daily by numerous complete strangers or that we are under surveillance 24/7. Other victims already know all about it. We see things that other people don’t.

Raising awareness about gangstalking means helping the unaware public to see what it is, that victims see. If anyone but the targeted victim can see the harassment, gangstalking loses a lot of its power. Seeing is believing, or so the saying goes.  The reverse of that is also true.  This means people tend to resist believing in what they don’t see. The problem with this is, you look with your eyes, but you see with your brain.  Just because you don’t see my Gangstalkers harassing me right in front of you, doesn’t mean you can’t!

 

Everybody can be trained to pay attention and be more observant. That said, perception is a funny thing.   Our eyes take in vast amounts of information. The brain filters, and processes all those visual cues, as well as input from our other sensory organs.   Our amazing brains, instantaneously, sift, sort, compare, compartmentalize, organize, and prioritize those sensory cues to make sense of the world around us, orienting us in our physical space and determining appropriate responses to the current environment.  Much of this is hardwired, such as the tendency for the brain to try to find patterns in those visual cues.   Presumably the ability  to pick out a predator, camouflaged against a backdrop of jungle foliage, was a beneficial skill for our ancestors to have.   It could mean the difference between having dinner and being dinner.

If the brain perceives a threat in the proximal environment, it understandably, gives it top priority.  Sensory cues determined by the brain to be high priority, get our attention.  It is the high priority cues that become conscious thoughts; those conscious thoughts get stored in short-term memory.   Top priority events also become conscious thoughts, but they get stored in long-term memory.  This explains why unimportant or trivial events are soon forgotten, while significant events  are  retained for life.

 

What we actually see is heavily influenced by the sum of our personal experiences. How well we pay attention, and what it is that we pay attention to, are skills, and, as such, they improve with practice.   Take a minute and look at the video below.

You are asked to do a simple task: Count how many times a ball is passed back and forth, between players. Despite the fact that every pass is done right in front of you, where you can see it, people often don’t get the answer right,  because it requires undivided attention – something modern multitaskers don’t do enough of.

Turn on the volume so you can hear the instructions. Be sure to remember your score when you finish watching. 

 

 

---

I have an analogy to explain why two people in the same environment might not see the same thing :

Two women spend the day together at a small, but busy, public beach.
At the end of the day each woman is asked to discuss the dogs they saw during the 6 hours they spent at the beach.

The first woman has cats. She loves her cats but doesn’t have much use for dogs. She doesn’t dislike dogs but she didn’t grow up with dogs and she lives in an apartment where they aren’t allowed. Her sister’s boyfriend has a dog, but she doesn’t see it often;  that’s really the only dog she knows. When it comes to dogs, she is indifferent.

The second woman was savagely bit by a neighbor’s dog when she was five and she still has the physical scars.  She doesn’t have a dog, she is afraid of them. She knows lots of people who have dogs, but she doesn’t visit them; she wouldnt:  they have dogs.  Her entire life she has had dog lovers trying to convince her that she has nothing to fear from dogs. They go on ad nauseum about their precious pooches, showing her pictures, like they were children, or even worse, begging her to pet them or interact with them. She is definitely not indifferent to dogs.

There were 24 dogs at the off leash beach, during the six hours the women spent there. When asked to discuss the dogs they saw that day, as you might imagine, the woman give very different answers.

The first woman said she saw dogs at the beach but she can’t really remember how many or what kind. She hardly noticed them. But she does remember there was one dog that ran past their blanket, chasing after a stick. She remembers it was big but she doesn’t remember much about how it looked. What she does remember is that the guy throwing the stick was really good-looking.

The second woman not only remembers the dogs, she can describe most of them. Surprisingly, she knows the breeds of several of them. She can tell you which ones were on leash,  because, she says they were running wild.   She can describe almost all of them,  right down to their sizes and whether they obeyed their respective owners, or not. She formed opinions  about what she perceived to be the temperaments of some of the doges.    Additionally she, could practically map out  the particular spot where the dogs and their owners had set up for the day, relative to their own spot on the sand. She says there were dogs running loose, fighting with each other,  not obeying their owners and completely out of control, and that it went on  all day long.   She adds that because of the “dog problem”, she’ll never go back to that particular beach again.

There is no doubt that the same dogs and the same women were all on the beach at the same time.  But what they actually saw at the beach that day is so dissimilar that it is hard to believe they were together.

They both had the same sensory input, but they perceived it quite differently. The brain will always give priority to a perceived, implied or potential threat. Gangstalking is just such a threat. For the record, viscous dogs have far better manners than gang stalkers.  A dog does not attack out of malice.

Gangstalkers, on the other hand conspire, premeditate and proceed with an intent to harm another person.  There is nothing innocent or excusable about the crime of gangstalking OR the people who take part in it.

 

Before a victim is aware of any gangstalking activity, these criminals have  already been covertly stalking, observing, and collecting publicly and privately available data about their target.  They’ve already invaded their victims privacy, using available technology, regardless whether it is legal or not.

It is only after this phase that they unleash the hounds. or dupes. or rank and file gangstakers,. or cult followers, or brainwashed devotees, or hash house harassers…. or what ever you want to call  people who will leap from the toilet at a moments notice if you suddenly leave your house, so they can stalk you.  (That thought alone, is one of the things that makes it so satisfying to take a leisurely trip, by car around the block, one time, before going back inside.) Remember, its not the smart ones who are actually doing the following and harassing.
During the reconnaissance phase, I went about my business just like every other unaware person out there. I don’t doubt that they were there, I just didn’t see them.  During this covert phase they are figuring out what your personal triggers are. What is it that bugs you? Is it traffic? Is it waiting in line? Is it rude people? Is it a particular stereo type…. homeless people, people from a particular ethnic group, gays, bible thumpers, bad parents, screaming children, polititians, people who leave trash in your yard? What ever it is, that personally irritates you is fair game. The harassment is personalized and tailored to play out in a public setting where only the players know who the actors are OR even that there are actors.

Then they start to pester you; if something doesn’t get your attention, they move on to the next offensive behavior on the list. The gangstalkers in the field pass on what they learn (i.e. what works on you) and they adapt, until they have your undivided attention. There is no shortage of the rude behaviors that multiple minds on a mission to annoy, can come up with.

When you first realize people are deliberately harassing you it is upsetting and unnerving. Just like the woman bitten by the dog, Gangstalkers get your attention because they are hostile, and they are a threat. If I didn’t notice them, my brain would not doing the job of prioritizing threats and making me acutely aware of their presence, despite all the other sensory stimuli my eyes and ears are taking in. Retail stores are filled with sites, colors, sounds; every product is placed to attract your attention. The unaware person is like the first girl on the beach. The victim is like the second girl at the beach.  But the perceived threat is much more real when it deliberately seeks you out.  Unlike the gangstalkers, the dogs were not at the beach BECAUSE the woman was there.  Gangstalkers, on the other hand are at the same place you are, BECAUSE you are there.  Planning and Intent raise the stakes and increase the threat.  And what threatens us, gets our attention.

Are gang stalkers  a real threat or just perceived as one? Put it this way, when you are stalked or harassed it gets your attention, and it makes you notice things you would have overlooked in the past.  Hyper-vigilance is a hard wired survival response when threatened. Gang Stalking is no joke.

Fact based evidence, proving a Gangstalking Program is ongoing and currently active can be found at the appropriately named, gangstalkingismurder.com  The site is extremely well documented with affidavits, government responses to FOIA requests, and main stream news reports on the topic.

Gangstalking really is murder…. I’d say that’s a threat.  I will explain why I think that this is fair and appropriate assessment of actual intent behind gangstalking in another post.

The purpose of today’s post was to convince you that you do not see EVERYTHING that goes on around you. Hopefully I’ve done that… but my ultimate goal is to open eyes. I want the unaware public to see what actually goes on around me and other victims of Gangstalking.

Gang Stalking Video: Gangstalking Recruitment and Incentives

I saw so many Fake videos about Gangstalking (many of them starring my own personal cast of Stalkers — posing as victims who act like they are crazy) when I first started researching and learning about gangstalking.  I mentioned on an early blog post that I thought most of them were fake, disinformation  or just a a waste of time.

Recently I have taken another look at some of the videos that are out there.  Some of the legitimate ones still won’t mean anything to those that are not victims or perpertrators of gangstalking.  But there are others that even the uninitiated can learn something from.

I haven’t posted any videos myself, but I want to recommend one video in particular, shot by a very obviously REAL VICTIM of Gangstalking.  This victim talks to his stalkers and confronts them in an easy self-confident manner.   I think he has done a great job of exposing his Gangstalkers.    He has posted 77 videos on You Tube and goes by the name Nappy Head Roots on his You Tube Channel.

The video called Gangstalker Debriefing is particularly interesting.  He basically gets this guy to tell him about what he knows about being recruited and what motivates the gangstalkers.  It seems legitimate to me and quite plausible, given what I’ve seen with my own eyes.

He films in San Jose, which is only half an hour from me.  His Gangstalkers go to ridiculous lengths to display or wear the color Red.  This appears to be a common theme used on many victims.  It is called Color Harassment and the red (or any color) is so that a victim who is constantly harassed by people wearing red, will spot them when they are not actively and overtly harassing.  A passerby might notice that a lot of people are wearing red, but only the victim will know that they are there because he is there.  They are stalking him and want him to know it.

We have never been color harassed and the reason for it is simple:  It hasn’t worked on us.  I have been so oblivious to color harassment that after taking pictures of my stalkers one Easter (the local hash house harassers pulled stalking duty that particular holiday.)  I didn’t realize until I viewed the pics later that they were all dressed up as Pastel colored Easter Eggs.  Pathetic Huh?  But truth is, I don’t notice clothing that much even when it’s as obvious as the ugly group of Easter Stalkers, dressed to impress.  I couldn’t be impressed because I didn’t even notice until I saw the pics.

They tailor the harassment methods to the individual.  They use what works and what they can get away with in public, without the unaware public realizing they are stalking and harassing someone.

The link to all of Nappy Head Root’s You tube channel is here.  He has quite a few comments on his videos.  The video where he is being harassed by a cop in the park who seems to be working with the gangstalking crew, is also worth seeing.

Gangstalking: The Distraction of “Busy Work”

 

I know a lot of people do not believe that a large group of people would stalk someone. Do you think that before World War  Two, ANY Germans, Jews, Americans, or other Europeans would have believed that a large group of people (Educated people, Civilized People) would use their intelligence to mechanically plan, design and carry out mass exterminations of other human beings living among them? Killing the largest amount of people  in the most efficient way, was treated like a manufacturing problem, with solutions devised accordingly.  It boggles the mind…. the kinds of things that humans will overlook, participate in or promote. Don’t believe it? Check out this episode of What Would You Do? where seemingly average people shopping willingly become accomplishes to crimes from stealing a wallet,  to kidnapping a baby. The reason? A complete stranger with a fake badge approached them, telling a lie and asking for their help.  That’s all it took for almost everyone approached to become an accessory to criminal acts.  Are you the type to obey an authority figure… even when they ask you to break the law?

No truly evil conspiracy starts out in the open where everyone can see and weigh in on it. Hitler would have never come to power if he had announced his intentions early on. Hitlers rise to power was insidious. Gangstalking is Insidious. It is like a creepy, invasive, persistent evil that is palpable. It happens when something is pushing into your life and with it comes a sense of dread and trepidation about things to come. Insidious is described perfectly in an essay written by an Austrian woman about Hitler’s takeover of Austria. It is a perfect description of how quickly something evil and insidious can take hold right in front of people who either can’t see it or refuse to. You may read some things discrediting the essay, saying it is not factually accurate or politically motivated. There may be some truth to that, but by and large, it explains exactly how Hitler took Austria without firing a shot — which nobody disputes. It describes the effectiveness of Propaganda and Economic Crisis in gaining acceptance for otherwise unacceptable policy changes. Our own War on Terror is a perfect example of how change happens and the unacceptable becomes acceptable.

There is a new book out called Shadow Government. Read this interview with the author to get a feel for the way our Government is morphing into something the majority of its citizens neither want nor will ultimately recognize. The author expresses a real concern that if people do not pay attention and mobilize against it…. it may soon be too late. Distraction is one of many tools that effectively keeps a population in passive acceptance of government overreach.

Gangstalking is a great tool for distraction. It’s busy work for people who have been duped into thinking they are playing an important role.  They’ve been made to feel important, sworn to secrecy, given special perks or consideration and they have bought into it with a vengeance. Many of them really think they are secret agents working on behalf of a shadow government. They believe they are making an important difference. The illusion of being important is what keeps them busy. Busy is shopping in stores that have nothing they want to buy. Busy is waiting around for a victim to leave the house, finish shopping, finish anything…..so they can follow.  Busy is a coordinating a show of force with a headlight line up. (By the way… that is one of the things that makes targets laugh at gangstalkers ; it certainly looks like irrefutable evidence that they must be more than a couple beers short of a six-pack. )  For keeping people distracted from what’s important…. the gangstalking tool is an excellent choice. It also has the advantage of wreaking havoc on the lives of a  few, which in some cases is, no doubt, useful.   This might also explain random targets. You can’t keep Gangstalkers busy if they don’t have someone to stalk. Most victims of gangstalking have come to realize that the numbers tell the real story. This is more about the large population of gangstalkers than it is a about the relatively small number of targets.

Gang Stalking takes place in the shadows. People often ask who would waste their time gangstalking? A better question would be who would benefit by keeping people chasing their tails? Who benefits from distraction, especially distraction on a large scale?

Did any targets go as a Trojan Horse for Halloween?  It would have been a highly appropriate choice!