Part 7: CHP’s Absurd Motion to Vacate

Internal Affairs Investigates

I really didn’t expect my complaint with the CHP Internal Affairs Division to go anywhere, and it didn’t. As I said, it wasn’t organized or well thought out. I felt pushed  into making my initial complaint a Formal complaint. I  told Lieutenant Desmond that I didn’t need to make it formal,   I just wanted to collect on the Judgement.   He told me if I didn’t make  a Formal Complaint the investigation would be closed.  That would have put me back where I started, so I filled out the complaint form they sent me.
The complaint as written by Internal Affairs paraphrased my words saying that I had alleged Kelly Walker was evasive, and unprofessional during inquiries into my legal judgement. YA THINK? Just a tad more formal, than I had put it, but as they say “good enough for Government work“.
Kelly Walker was not important to me. She was merely a gate-keeper, who wasn’t quite up to the task.  It is quite possible to run interference for a boss and still come across as likeable and even helpful. See my post about the Deputy Chief at the Santa Cruz Police Department, if you want to see how its done.
Avoidance isn’t really a good tool for managing situations or people. When unable to avoid them, obvious lies are another bad choice. Yeah, I’d say she was unprofessional, allegedly!

---

The Unspoken Message

One odd thing I noticed was that the people in Legal Affairs and Risk Management, were noticeably hostile towards me, during many of my phone inquires. I really have a hard time understanding that. They were absolutely acting like I didn’t deserve a second of their time and like I was screwing over the Highway Patrol in general, and them personally. This seemed to be inexplicably personal to them — they were angry at me, and it showed.  This started before I contacted Internal Affairs for help.  From my point of view the hostility was misplaced and undeserved.  It’s creepy, when you think about it.
This narrow-minded way of thinking, seems central to the culture of the California Highway Patrol: They are above the law, and they resent anybody who tries to infringe on their entitlement.  How else can you explain losing a lawsuit and refusing to comply with a court order? They didn’t think I deserved to challenge their authority in court; They were angry at me for putting them in this position;  I had threatened their power and their Right to always be RIGHT.  They had no intention of rewarding or reinforcing me for this. 
There was an unspoken message conveyed through all this hostility.  I’m  fairly intuitive and my perception of the message still feels right to me, almost 5 years later.  The message was one of indignation:

“WHO DO YOU THINK YOU ARE?  HOW DARE YOU DO THIS TO THE CALIFORNIA HIGHWAY PATROL”

That so many employees seem to buy into and uphold this warped perception, which is so removed from the intended role of the Highway Patrol, seems strangely,  indoctrinated to me. Maybe this unquestioning loyalty (regardless of morality) is unique to law enforcement agencies (i.e. the blue line).  I thought it was very weird.

---

Balance of Power

The California Highway Patrol behaves in a way that is both self-serving and arrogant.  As an Agency, they seem to be unable or unwilling to hide it. The scary thing is that when Government stops hiding illegal or immoral acts, it’s because they no longer have to. They’ve consolidated enough power to do as they wish and no one can stop them. The CHP is well insulated by California’s Justice System and the Legislature. They aren’t too concerned about acting outside the law. It is a rare occasion when they are held accountable for bad acts.
Our Federal Government is headed that way. They still act embarrassed when they get caught doing something illegal, but nothing changes.  It continues and we just get used to it. Our Government is turning into the monster the Constitution tried to protect us from.  The system that was meant to check and balance Government power, has been so diluted, its impotent.

The Federal Government is currently under-checked and dangerously out of balance. The Legislature has never been more ineffective. The Judicial system is neither blind nor impartial. The Security Agencies have run amok, using secrecy to shield illegal acts and no one seems able or willing to rein them in.  The violations that have been exposed are the tip of the iceberg.

The only thing that government seems to fear at all, is a free press.  Under the Obama administration there have been extraordinary measures to muzzle those that would report or expose immoral, illegal and self-serving government activity. The free internet, whistle blowers and reporters are in the cross-hairs. 

When  a voracious non native species, with no natural enemies, is introduced into an environment it either fundamentally changes or destroys that environment and is harmful to native inhabitants. Freedom of Speech and Freedom of the Press are natural enemies to Government Abuse of Power.  If the government is successful in its efforts to limit those freedoms, they’ve essentially vanquished their last natural enemy.  It will be harmful  to the inhabitants. We can’t let that happen.

If censorship is successful, the Feds will be just like the CHP: Arrogant, Above the Law and so insulated they don’t even have to act embarrassed when corruption, or any other bad act is exposed.
If these CHP employees think its wrong for a Judge to order their employer (large organization, with big budget)  to return money they seized from an individual, they really ought to see how it feels to be the individual whose money was seized,  bypassing the Judge altogether.  I can tell you right now… that feels like a violation and is a much better reason to be upset.
To see these employees upset when their employer is court ordered to give the money back…. ? Cry me a river.   Boo Hoo!  They had no right to be angry with me. I did everything legally and by the book. They likewise had no right to make collecting on the judgement such a nightmare.
And the delaying, the stalling, the rudeness … it’s not over yet!

---

Internal Affairs Concludes the Investigation

Clearly Kelly Walker was only part (and not the most important part) of my Complaint to Internal Affairs. If you missed it, you can find it here.

The letter informing me of the outcome of the investigation said they didn’t find substantial evidence to support my allegations regarding Staff Services Manager, Kelly Walker……bla bla bla.  They never even addressed the part of the complaint that had to do with the Legal Affairs Department ducking a Court Order.  Unfortunately, I was getting used to that.

But in some respects the Internal Affairs Investigation was helpful. R. Jones, a Captain in the Office of Investigation assigned K. A. Hunter, Legal Affairs Commander and supervisor to Kelly Walker to look into the matter and resolve any issues. It was through Hunter that I was FINALLY given the name and number of Staff Attorney, John McDonough.

I left him a message near the end of June or early July (I think). When he called me back on a Friday afternoon, I really wasn’t expecting to like the man.  But he was funny and charming. He made me laugh.  (A talent he should share with Kelly Walker.)

If you are the Staff Attorney for the CHP and you have to explain why your client (who is duty bound to uphold the law) is breaking the law, a little charm sure can’t hurt.

---

Finally, I Get Some Answers

The big question:

WHAT IS HOLDING UP PAYMENT OF MY COURT ORDERED JUDGEMENT OF $482.00?

We are looking to have the Judgement Vacated. We will be going back before the Judge on the matter.

OH REALLY…. AND ON WHAT GROUNDS?

On the Grounds we were never served.

Really? Because I paid the court $25.00 to serve you. And they gave me a receipt showing Proof of Service.

What address did you use?

Joe Farrell, Attorney General for State of California, at the AG’s Office in Sacramento.

See, you served the Attorney General. You didn’t serve the California Highway Patrol, so we didn’t ever receive it. You needed to serve us for it to be a valid service.

Well that’s funny because…. right on the State of California web site, in the section called “Small Claims Court Self Help” it says :

“IF YOU ARE SUING the California Highway Patrol,  serve them at the Office of the Attorney General. “

Then it gives the address. — The same address I had the court serve you at.

WHAT? Where is this Website…. ? Hold on let me get my legal assistant on that, and I’ll get back to you.

---

Motion to Vacate

The CHP Legal Affairs Department, and John McDonough, specifically, filed a Motion to Vacate the Judgement six months, TO THE DAY,  that the original judgement was filed. We were due back in court near the end of September 2010, where the Judge would hear the Motion.

The reason they gave? It was absurd.  I had a very hard time believing that such a legal maneuver could really exist or be taken seriously in a court of law.
The grounds they used to ask for the Judgement to be vacated were:  Mishap, Inadvertence,  Malfeasance, and failure to realize the importance of showing up for the hearing.

WHAT? I had no idea what that even meant, so I had to look into it. 

First of all, It is absurd to even suggest that the legal arm of the CHP doesn’t realize the importance of showing up in court to defend against a claim.  These people are lawyers.  Most small claims participants have no legal training at all.  When we get served, even without legal training, we know enough to realize that if we don’t go, and mount a defense, you are going to lose. It isn’t possible that this high powered legal team did not realize the importance of being served.  It is not grounds for the Judge to Vacate the original Judgement.

The combination of Mishap, Inadvertence, and Malfeasance is seldom used by an Attorney. It is the equivalent to an admission of incompetence and alludes to  deliberate wrongful action on the part of an Attorney in carrying out their duties.

This is like an Attorney, who is throwing himself on the mercy of court and pleading with the Judge: (Picture the back of a hand, pressed open to forehead with palm facing outward, blinking back big crocodile tears) Oh woe is me, Your Honor, I have made a mess of this. Please don’t allow my client to suffer for my mistakes.

As you can imagine , lawyer jokes aside… Attorneys aren’t scrambling all over themselves to fall on their own swords, calling attention to their incompetence in open court. Not that Lawyers aren’t known for altruistic behavior and self sacrifice for the benefit of their clients. John McDonough, must have been a rare lawyer indeed to make that kind of sacrifice for his poor misrepresented client, the little ‘ol CHP. In reality it was just a BS excuse to get back in front of the Judge.

Unlike most Lawyers who would never risk using this as grounds to vacate, Mr McDonough wasn’t running the risk of  being disciplined, sanctioned or disbarred by making this type of astounding admission for the record and open court.  He wasn’t even going to keep future business at bay, by telling the world he was a bad lawyer.  This was all just an excuse to put us back in front of the Judge.
Furthermore isn’t some incompetent Lawyer, poorly representing the CHP. He is on their Payroll. If he screwed up, they screwed up. He is part of the organization that is the CHP. He does not have a client who was poorly represented. He is the client. He works strictly for the CHP, representing only their interests in all legal matters. He is the Legal Face of the CHP.
The CHP has enough tax dollars to pick and choose among lawyers. They are embroiled in law suits all the time.  If our case fell through the cracks, it was because a Small Claims case meant NOTHING to them. It was insignificant. It only became significant when we won. The CHP doesn’t have to show up in court, because of the substantial hurdles a plaintiff has to get over before the court will hear their case.   It is as the Judge told my husband, when he found our paperwork in order:

“This Never Happens.”

And because nobody ever has the paperwork to prove they can legally sue, the Judge automatically dismisses the case, without any need for the CHP to be present. They don’t show up, because they don’t have to. The Judgement in our favor, was a huge surprise to them.  Apparently, with all their legal resources, they were ill-equipped to deal with Small Claims Court or a Judgement NOT in their favor.  And they were… FURIOUS.
I hope my readers are starting to get the picture of what we were up against here. If you think they have acted like bad losers and have been petty and childish so far…. I am NOT DONE.
The conclusion of this story will appear in the next post.  Things are not as they seem in California.   After I tell you what the CHP did next,  if you live in California, you’ll think they owe you some money now, too . Nobody should be spending our tax dollars this way…. If wasting our money isn’t a crime, it should be. It’s also amusing if you like your humor along the lines of WHAT WERE THEY THINKING? or Americas Dumbest Criminals, you’ll get a kick out of it.
The last post also exposes one more bad act, this one not done by the CHP.  It is , however so blatant and chilling, I think, that everything the CHP did to us, pales by comparison. The CHP, definitely doesn’t have an exclusive on behaving badly.

NOTE To Readers:
Throughout the eight posts that tell this story, I put the real names of the people who handled our case at the CHP. One of those people is almost certainly the person who submitted our name to a government watch list, knowing that it would lead to ongoing stalking, monitoring and constant harassment.  It started four years ago, and continues today.

We aren’t on this list because we are terrorists or a threat to anybody. Our crime was embarrassing the CHP and exercising our legal rights effectively. We threatened the ABOVE THE LAW status that the CHP takes for granted, and we are being punished for it, with no legal recourse.

That is the reason I write this blog,

SceneNSantaCruz

One more thing:

I have never posted any videos of any kind. If you see a video that indicates it came from me or has anything to do with my blog Justifiably Disturbed, you can be certain that it I had nothing to do with it.  If the day comes for me to post videos, you will see them on this blog before you see them on YouTube.

A quick word about Gangstalking related comments…

I have quickly realized that I cannot possibly vouch for the credibility of the links you find in the comment area of my blog.   Some of the commenters have blogs with hundreds of posts, going back years.  Some mix up the topic of Gangstalking with theories I cannot possibly endorse. Some are disinformation sites.

My favorite comment was “Stop poking the bear. Instead pick up a 2’x4′ and beat the snot out of him. “ when I checked out the comment author’s blog,  I discovered three important  things:   He does indeed seem to be a real victim of Gang Stalking.  He is openly racist, and fanatical  in his hatred of Gays.

I do not want to endorse those beliefs, by directing traffic to his blog, however the fact that he is a real TI, creates a bit of a dilemma.

My personal philosophy is that everyone should be able to choose to live their life, as they wish, no matter what their race or religion, or sexual orientation,  without judgement or interference.   There are plenty of people who don’t agree.  Clearly gangstalkers  have  stripped us of the freedom to live our lives unharassed.   They are far worse than even this TI blogger, because they are acting on their hatred and ignorance, instead of merely voicing it.

This commenter has a right to voice his opinion.  I have the right to say I find it offensive.  We can all choose for ourselves what we wish to read, and what we choose to think.  But wouldn’t it be awful to not have a choice?  Wouldn’t it be awful to never even be exposed to opinions different from your own?    (We might all end up like the Stepford Gang Stalkers… conforming and going along with whatever the cult dictates, discouraged from questioning authority, and not free enough  to think for themselves.).

With that in mind, I am going  to do less moderation of the comments, which means more of them will be approved.   There are some gems mixed in with the disinformation.  I figure by reading the disinformation stuff, we get a glimpse  into the minds of  the people trying to oppress us.  You cannot write, without giving something of yourself away.   It is good to know what your enemy is thinking and saying.  Sometimes the topics avoided, are the biggest giveaway of all.

I cannot vouch for or verify the links you find in the Comment Section, that follows my posts.

If they do not  support my mission to get Credibility for targeted individuals, you can be sure I don’t endorse them and /or have not read the content.

I will at some point be posting a list e to sites and blogs I do recommend, that support my message.

thank you! SceneNSantaCruz

Part 4: CHP bills for “Accident Investigation”

ACCIDENT INVESTIGATION CHARGES:   No Conviction Required

 

We got the first demand letter from the CHP in October, 4 months after the accident and 2 months after the DMV returned my husband’s drivers license.
The Demand letter is for Accident Recovery Costs, pursuant to Government Codes 53150 and 53158. The bill is to pay the salary of the CHP for his time spent working a DUI case. 7 hours and 40 minutes were billed at the officer’s 2007 salary (with benefits) of 73.00 per hour.
It was broken down just like a normal bill:

• Incident Investigation (response time, on scene investigation, follow-up investigation report, writing):

6 Hours, 20 Minutes

• Vehicle Storage:

0 Hours, 00 Minutes

• In Custody (field sobriety test, transportation, booking, chemical tests):

 1 Hours, 20 Minute

• Traffic Control

0 Hours, 00 Minutes

• Other

0 Hours, 00 Minutes

Total: 7 Hours, 40 Minutes @ $73.00/hr = $559.67

My husband had never been arraigned or heard anything from the courts, regarding the arrest. We had no idea exactly what this meant. We naiively thought that maybe they had decided not to persue it.
The 2nd Demand letter came in November;   I wrote a letter disputing the charges, saying my husband had not been convicted of a DUI and, in fact, the DMV had returned the license the CHP had confiscated at the scene.
In the mean time my husband was arraigned in Santa Cruz Superior Court for the DUI.
I’m going to try to wrap up the court stuff quickly, because it’s not central to my fight with the CHP.
Most people probably just plead guilty, when they get a DUI.  It is hard to win if you don’t have a lawyer, and even if you do, I suspect.  Lawyers often attack the BAC evidence, sometimes bringing in experts.  It is expensive to defend against a DUI and expensive to be convicted of one.  I don’t think that many people get out of a DUI, once they’ve been arrested for it.

I want to make one thing clear here: I do not want to be on the road with drunks any more than you do. They are dangerous and scary. Strict penalties for DUI have made our roads much much safer than they used to be.  The consequences of drunk driving are so steep, that they have acted as a deterrent .  I am all for that.
I am also for something called Due Process. The CHP and the DMV are able to collect Accident Investigation Charges, and Reinstatement Fees from people who have not been convicted of Drunk Driving. Remember the Constitution? The part where it says “you are innocent, until proven guilty in a court of law”.  Is there anyone out there who thinks this should apply to most crimes, but not to DUI? REALLY?   Our constitution is here to protect us. Every exception to it hurts us, collectively.

COURT PROCEEDINGS

At his arraignment, in late December of 2007 my husband pleaded not guilty.  Before things wrapped at the end of April, 2008. there had been 3 or 4 pretrial conferences.

At the arraignment, because my husband pleaded not guilty, the Judge asked him if he was being represented by council. He told the court he would be representing himself. The Judge then called him back into chambers, where the DA was present, to discuss it.

In chambers the Judge asked if he was below the income threshold required to have the court appoint him an attorney. He replied that he made too much money to qualify, but not so much that he could afford an attorney.

My husband, clearly not understanding the rules of court,  kept trying to tell the Judge and the Prosecuting Attorney that he was innocent. He was trying to make it clear to the Judge, that the  witnesses would testify that the CHP Officer had lied on the report.

The Judge kept waving him off, saying he didn’t want to hear about that right now. My husband was indignant that the Judge didn’t want to know why he was innocent. I assume this went on for a few minutes with my husband and the Judge getting more and more frustrated with each other.

(In case you, like my husband, do not know the rules of court: The arraignment is to get the business stuff out of the way.  The Judge never hears a defense against the charges, unless the case actually gets to trial. You also would not want to be telling the DA your defense strategy at this point, and a Judge is probably expected to protect an ignorant defendant from himself, by keeping him from making a huge mistake.

Finally the Judge, fed up with my husband said, “YOU CANNOT REPRESENT YOURSELF IN MY COURT”. To this, my husband replies “ISN”T THAT MY RIGHT?” The Judge threw up his hands and said to the court administrator, “I’ve had enough of this… Give him an attorney.”

RESOLUTION OF THE LEGAL CASE

In the end, after 4 pretrial conferences, his court appointed attorney suggested he plea to a (dry) reckless driving ( A dry reckless means no alcohol or drugs were involved.) and Pay a fine of 300.00. She would represent him to have it expunged in a years time.

She had told my husband early on she could win if it went to trial. She had interviewed all the witnesses and had excellent statements from them. As time went on and meeting after meeting with the DA took place my husband says she got really busy and she seemed to just want to get it over with. He agreed to take a plea to the reckless driving (dry), at the urging of his attorney, even though he was not driving at the time of the accident. He regrets it to this day.

When they went back to court a year later the DA argued against an expungement, but the Judge, ruled in my husband’s favor saying he would allow it. The attorney then needed to file the paper with the court. I don’t know if that was done or not, but it never came off his record, something we found out just recently.

My husband regrets taking a plea, as do innocent people all over the country. There is a lot of pressure, for guilty and the innocent to take a plea.  It isn’t really a great system; but it greatly reduces the cost of prosecution and it brings in all kinds of money, in fines.

INTERCEPTION

In the meantime, my letter to the CHP disputing the Accident Investigation Charges got a response in February, 2008. In summary it said:

The Santa Cruz Area office of the CHP has concluded that your invoice is appropriate.
Below is a brief explanation as to why you are liable and responsible to reimburse the State of California for these Charges under Government Code Sections 53150 and 53158.
Government Code Sections 53150 through 53158 authorizes the California Highway Patrol, under the DUI Cost Recovery Program to seek reimbursement for the full costs incurred in responding to alcohol or drug related traffic incidents. The Legislature has set aside driving under the influence as a behavior which taxpayers should not have to subsidize. These charges are not based on a conviction of driving under the influence. Reimbursement is based on Government code Section 53150 which says in part:

Any person who is under the influence of an alcoholic beverage or any drug… whose negligent operation of a motor vehicle caused by that influence proximately causes any incident resulting in an appropriate emergency response,…. is liable for the expense of an emergency response by a public agency to the incident.

We received a 2nd demand letter for $559.67 in February and a FINAL NOTICE at the beginning of March. The letter said if they had not received payment within 30 days they would be turning the invoice over to a collection agency and The Franchise Tax Board for offset.
In May they intercepted our tax return, taking the entire amount of 361.95, which was not enough to cover the full amount of the bill. It was, however enough to infuriate me that they could do this without a court order or a conviction for an alcohol related offense.  I wasn’t even there, but the tax return was half mine.

I decided to sue the CHP in small claims court to get our money back.

Silly me, I thought I had a right to do that.
I was about to learn that exercising your constitutional right, might not be a good idea. In fact, it could be a very bad idea.

If I thought it was unfair to intercept a tax return without a court order, I was about to learn that the big boys don’t have to play fair.  The laws that govern the rest of us, don’t apply. And as for the CHP….. you can check that box N/A.
Stay tuned… You now have all the background information. Everything to come, is the reason I tell the story in the first place.

NOTE TO READERS

I’ve had no feedback, for the last 4 posts. The link to my site, when I copy it online, looks like gibberish, instead of what it should be.    https://justifiablydisturbed.wordpress.com/

Email was changed to go to a mailbox I don’t own. Due to my subject matter, I am understandably a bit uneasy.  So feedback, please.

Thank you,
SceneNSantaCruz

Gangstalking Posts Generate Interest

 

I want to address all those people who have written comments, those who may do so in the future.  I am really happy to hear from you.  It means a lot to me.  Collectively, we have a lot of information.  We see our perpetrators every day.  We are paying attention and we are highly attuned to the way they operate.  Sharing that information can help other targets.  A little humor can give us a laugh and help us marginalize them for a change. I do have a couple hilarious tips, where, for at least occasionally, I’ve made their life worse than they were trying to make mine.  (to be shared in future posts). 

The comments, likes. re-posts, shares, and people who are now following  the blog (you physical followers…KMA!) are really encouraging. It helps me to feel like we are our own community and like maybe we have a fighting chance.  Our numbers may be small by comparision but judging by the comments, and my own personal feelings, our OUTRAGE is large.  That Passionate outrage we feel at being treated so terrible by our fellow humans, has been known to change the coarse of history.   We need to be angry.  Nobody has the right to do this to another human being.

Even though I didn’t do anything on this blog for 2 years. I continued to get readers and views and comments during that time. After I wrote the 2 years later post, I began moderating the comments that had piled up.  I still have 65 older comments to go through.

I am sure there are people out there, who are legitimately being gangstalked , who also happen to be crazy.  By and large, though, the targets of gangstalking are sane people, put under tremendous stress by the complete insanity around them. Credibility for all of us victims, and exposure for all of our gangstalkers is my goal. To that end, if your comments have anything fringe or crazy sounding, I’m not going to post them. 

If I think they have helpful content, with some fringe,  I may edit them.  You know how I feel about censuring and freedom of speech  (if not, read this post).  But in this case, my blog…my message.  If your comment does not further my goal of getting credibility for TiI’s among the uninformed public It’s not going to be made public.

 

Please don’t be offended. I might believe you are a real victim, but still feel that your story will be hard for the uninitiated to accept. If that is the case, your message was still be received and read with interest; it will just have a smaller audience.  It’s ok to discuss and comment outrageous things fringe theory, but for my blog, you have to do it in a way that I think comes across as credible if you want to read it later.

 

If you include a link with your comment, that’s great… I do check them out, prior to approving the comment. I don’t want to post links to web sites and blogs that further the interests of the people harassing me. We all know that a lot of comments are made by the very people that are gangstalking us. If you have any doubts about that, from day one, within hours of my first post, I’ve had a following. The only people who could have found my post that quickly, are the esteemed members of my own personal stalker fan club (I don’t take credit for the fan club term, but I like it –  I fist saw it when a woman, commenting  on gangstalking in the “experience project” said her and her daughter called their stalkers their “fan club”).

Gangstalkers were my first readers because, as we all know, they don’t miss a trick. But hey, even if you are a stalker, I’ll approve your comments, if…. they further my stated goals for this blog.

The comments that include links and have questions for me are going to take a little longer for me to moderate. Nothing is being discarded without careful consideration. If you asked where I got my info on a particular subject, I will answer you, as soon as I get through the quick decision comments.

If you ask me to keep your comment private, I fully intend to do that. I felt terrible when I saw that a comment was posted that I was specifically asked to keep private. I am so sorry that happened. I was certain that I had checked the unapproved box until  I saw it on the page. This was not intentional.  No doubt, caused by going through the back log of comments so quickly (some of them are even longer than my posts- I don’t mind long, though) The problem has now been corrected. Again, I am so sorry.

Disinformation is a tool for Censorship

Disinformation is a tool for Censorship.

Gangstalkers act as trolls on the internet. They are keeping tabs on the postings and comments made by their victims. If they read something that might expose gangstalking, they leap into action. You see a lot of their handiwork in the form of comments following articles or posts, which cover the subject of Organized Harassment..

You should be able to spot their lies; for people who claim to NOT believe in Gangstalking… They spend an awful lot of time on forums that are specific to the topic.

I don’t really believe in ghosts, I am certain aliens are not visiting earth, but gangstalking is absolutely real. As you read about all the comments that say how paranoid, delusional, schizophrenic (take your pick) people who claim to be gangstalked are….you may finally realize that there are an awful lot of people, writing an awful lot of derogatory stuff, in the comment sections of victim’s websites. Real blogs will probably take advantage of the moderation feature (I know I do) and delete derogatory comments. These criminals are WAY too interested in influencing other people to NOT believe, in something they insist isn’t even real, in the first place.

If you don’t believe in something… A normal reaction would be to not dwell on it… The Internet is a huge place, with something for everybody’s interests.. I don’t believe in Big Foot, so spending my time on-line, with people who do, seems like a big waste. I’m not that interested in convincing unknown other people, that people who DO believe in Big Foot, are disturbed or delusional. Really, I just don’t care if complete strangers, do, or do not, believe in Big Foot.

If I thought Gangstalking wasn’t real (assuming I had ever even heard of it) I am not going to be spending a lot of time on victim’s web sites, trying to convince everybody they are crazy. Who cares that much about controlling the beliefs of others? Gangstalking seems to be all about control. This extreme interest in gangstalking is just not normal for someone who claims its a fantasy of delusional minds. It’s all part of a the big disinformation campaign, to keep it from seeing the light of day.

Since I wrote my last post a day or two ago, the Gangstalkers have been busy, I mentioned victim and activist, Eleanor White, as a credible source. They took her booklet and put out a hacked one where they make her sound like a nutcase. The booklet uses the same format, as the real ones authored by Eleanor. The hacked one tells victims it is all hopeless, and to keep quiet and not tell anyone about the organized harassment. I commented in my last post, that they usually put the info making the author sound crazy. right up front. Gangstalkers responded by inserting the really crazy stuff further in: that she brushes her teeth with ivory soap, wears sandpaper in her underwear and uses a nail attached to a large stick to make a hole in her clothes to scratch herself because Gangstalkers make her itch. They want you to think that Eleanor is a few screws loose.

There were three new links to her work as of yesterday ( dated 2010, so you wouldn’t think they were just first posted just yesterday) that I am sure were placed there in case my web page directed any traffic to her. Every one of them was altered to destroy her credibility. That’s a very swift response. They also fleshed out some of the pages that I accused of having faux fronts. As I said, they have been busy since my last post.

Every response they post to the web to refute the very existence of Gangstalking, litters the Internet with more proof that it does. True or false, the sheer amount of things on the Internet that reference it….indicate somebody knows about it. Either real victims who see the Internet as the only way to get the public to understand what’s happening, or the people posting whole pages, posing as crazies to discredit us… We’ve all been busy getting the word out and the proliferation of false leads may help us more than it hurts us.

The Immediate response to my latest blog post about disinformation, says volumes about how serious they are about containing the truth. This isn’t something that should just anger victims of the Gangstalkers….it should alarm everybody. Think about it in more general terms. They are interfering with everybody’s right to access information. Do you think someone has the right to block your access to a free exchange of thoughts and ideas. ? Do you think anyone has the right to prevent someone from expressing their right to freedom of speech, by deliberate sabotage? Do they have the right to direct interested parties to spoofed sites by overwhelming search engines with false leads? Do they have the right to replace real sites with fake ones? This is a deliberate attempt to prevent you from hearing real people’s opinions and making up your own mind. This is a form of censorship.

I don’t know if this is illegal, but it certainly seems unconstitutional. This interferes with everybody’s right to participate in a free exchange of ideas– They are attempting to censor the Internet and stop you from accessing information that is available through tactics, that on a smaller scale, act like a denial of service attack.

First they block access to information about Gangstalking ? What’s next? These people need to be stopped, or they will soon make censorship their primary business. Wake up! This is a deliberate power play. People who want power this desperately aren’t going to stop with just controlling your access to websites telling the truth about Gangstalking? The more successful they are at censuring the truth about Organized Harassment, the closer they are to obscuring something that YOU think is vitally important. Help us spread the word. Everybody has a right to available information…. Information that will allow them to form an intelligent opinion. Censurship and secrecy are like acid, eroding human rights violations and eating away at the very foundation of a free society.

If you read this, please comment in the section below. I have changed it so that you no longer have to log in or put your email address. I want to know that I am reaching somebody and not being censored by Gangstalkers.