Justifiably Disturbed by Gang Stalking: Mission Statement

My goal in writing this blog is very specific: I want to garner support and credibility for gangstalking victims, among the unaware public.   Being a victim is bad enough, but having to first explain the crime, and then convince people that it really does happen, is particularly demoralizing. It is like being victimized again by those who would unquestionably support you, if you were the victim of almost any other crime.

If you are a Targeted Individual you already know plenty about skepticism.  Prior to being gangstalked, I can never remember having my credibility, or my version of events being questioned. I am a skeptic myself, but this  type of skepticism is something I was completely unfamiliar with.  I realize skepticism is a practical tool to facilitate the search for the truth. Truth is trump. Doubting that the holocaust ever happened doesn’t make you a healthy skeptic, it makes you uninformed or an idiot. I will consider it a victory when gang stalking awareness has achieved 3 things:

1. Gangstalking becomes a familiar mainstream term, that people equate to Organized Harassment.
2. The unaware public has become aware that it goes on and don’t doubt its veracity any more than they doubt that bullying or genocide are real.
3. Targeted Individuals are recognized as Victims.  Gangstalking is considered a serious, reprehensible crime, and perpetrators are criminals. responsible and held accountable for their behavior.  Victims will not need to convince anybody it happens; everyone will be familiar with it.

It was really shocking for me to realize that people, friends, family. neighbors, etc. were skeptical of my accounts of being followed and harassed by strangers.  All my years of being truthful and stable was not enough, to overcome the doubt that strangers would actually do this to someone they didn’t know.

As I said in an earlier entry, these strangers are exhibiting focussed hostile behavior towards you that is usually reserved for vendettas of a very personal nature. You lose support when you cannot come up with the answer to the question “WHY?” “Who would put this much effort into it?” The skepticism is understandable,  because it seems to defy logic. At first you can hardly believe it yourself. Your world is turned upside down and you feel disoriented, shocked even.  Realizing that everything is different then you thought it was  is easy to resist and hard to accept.

Early on, I remember reading information by other victims of gangstalking, and feeling skeptical about some of the experiences they  described. I was appalled that people were treating me with skepticism — but at the same time I was doubting what other victims (credible victims) were reporting. I remember reading Mark Rich’s “The Hidden Evil” on the web (before he had compiled it into a book). I never have doubted that he is a targeted Individual. Not then. Not Now. He is the real deal. But I was new to being gangstalked and I hadn’t experienced how pervasive it is–or how money (or lack of it) really is no object.
Mark Rich wrote of a trip that he took to visit someone (a sister, I think) in another state. He got on a plane and 2 of his stalkers boarded the plane with him. I didn’t believe it. I thought the stress of being stalked had caused him to see stalkers where there were none. Today… there is absolutely no doubt in my mind that his stalkers got on the plane with him, just as he described.

Eleanor White has a pamphlet that explains what is happening to us, It is a tool for victims to give to people who have never heard of gang stalking before. Because, as she explains, people who have not experienced what we have… are not ready for the truth. In essence, they can’t handle the truth. It doesn’t mean that the bystanding unaware public will never be able to handle the truth. What it means is that, the truth is something so out of their realm of experience that they need to have it spoon fed to them or they will choke on it and discount you as a Nutter. (I’ve been playing around with British Slang lately)  This spoon-feeding approach advocated by Eleanor is helpful. Her pamphlet really does help lower the credibility hurdle. I’ve used it with positive results. But I do have a less rigid approach.

The most important thing to me is to present the information in a way that is credible, even if what I am describing seems absolutely incredible to the uninitiated. Gangstalking takes place in the midst of the UNAWARE PUBLIC. They don’t see a thing–but they could, and would, if they were aware of it and/or looking for it. Exposure will take a lot of the power away from gangstalking activities. Getting the word out is the best way to stop it. I really believe that. That is my goal. That’s what I want. I want to see the rock these criminals are hiding under, overturned. I want to put an end to the cloak of plausible deniability and to them flying under the radar.

I hate having my credibility questioned. My personal feeling is that I have to temper my words so they don’t contribute to the unaware public associating the term gangstalking with anything other than what it is. A lot of the disinformation out there, attempts to paint it as some sort of fringe phenomenon. It isn’t. Gangstalking is organized and meticulously thought out and planned. It is not being perpetrated by humans with reptilian DNA, aliens, Satan or the Occult.

The hocus pocus fringe theories are put forth predominately by gangstalkers in an attempt to make victims look crazy. The fact that they have been so prolific about it has actually helped us, by spreading the term.  The term Gangstalking seems more common and main stream today than it was, even two years ago. They have done their part to help spread the term “gangstalking”. I expect it to become even more common with time.

Next post will address the many comments I have received.