A quick word about Gangstalking related comments…

I have quickly realized that I cannot possibly vouch for the credibility of the links you find in the comment area of my blog.   Some of the commenters have blogs with hundreds of posts, going back years.  Some mix up the topic of Gangstalking with theories I cannot possibly endorse. Some are disinformation sites.

My favorite comment was “Stop poking the bear. Instead pick up a 2’x4′ and beat the snot out of him. “ when I checked out the comment author’s blog,  I discovered three important  things:   He does indeed seem to be a real victim of Gang Stalking.  He is openly racist, and fanatical  in his hatred of Gays.

I do not want to endorse those beliefs, by directing traffic to his blog, however the fact that he is a real TI, creates a bit of a dilemma.

My personal philosophy is that everyone should be able to choose to live their life, as they wish, no matter what their race or religion, or sexual orientation,  without judgement or interference.   There are plenty of people who don’t agree.  Clearly gangstalkers  have  stripped us of the freedom to live our lives unharassed.   They are far worse than even this TI blogger, because they are acting on their hatred and ignorance, instead of merely voicing it.

This commenter has a right to voice his opinion.  I have the right to say I find it offensive.  We can all choose for ourselves what we wish to read, and what we choose to think.  But wouldn’t it be awful to not have a choice?  Wouldn’t it be awful to never even be exposed to opinions different from your own?    (We might all end up like the Stepford Gang Stalkers… conforming and going along with whatever the cult dictates, discouraged from questioning authority, and not free enough  to think for themselves.).

With that in mind, I am going  to do less moderation of the comments, which means more of them will be approved.   There are some gems mixed in with the disinformation.  I figure by reading the disinformation stuff, we get a glimpse  into the minds of  the people trying to oppress us.  You cannot write, without giving something of yourself away.   It is good to know what your enemy is thinking and saying.  Sometimes the topics avoided, are the biggest giveaway of all.

I cannot vouch for or verify the links you find in the Comment Section, that follows my posts.

If they do not  support my mission to get Credibility for targeted individuals, you can be sure I don’t endorse them and /or have not read the content.

I will at some point be posting a list e to sites and blogs I do recommend, that support my message.

thank you! SceneNSantaCruz

Justifiably Disturbed by Gang Stalking: Mission Statement

My goal in writing this blog is very specific: I want to garner support and credibility for gangstalking victims, among the unaware public.   Being a victim is bad enough, but having to first explain the crime, and then convince people that it really does happen, is particularly demoralizing. It is like being victimized again by those who would unquestionably support you, if you were the victim of almost any other crime.

If you are a Targeted Individual you already know plenty about skepticism.  Prior to being gangstalked, I can never remember having my credibility, or my version of events being questioned. I am a skeptic myself, but this  type of skepticism is something I was completely unfamiliar with.  I realize skepticism is a practical tool to facilitate the search for the truth. Truth is trump. Doubting that the holocaust ever happened doesn’t make you a healthy skeptic, it makes you uninformed or an idiot. I will consider it a victory when gang stalking awareness has achieved 3 things:

1. Gangstalking becomes a familiar mainstream term, that people equate to Organized Harassment.
2. The unaware public has become aware that it goes on and don’t doubt its veracity any more than they doubt that bullying or genocide are real.
3. Targeted Individuals are recognized as Victims.  Gangstalking is considered a serious, reprehensible crime, and perpetrators are criminals. responsible and held accountable for their behavior.  Victims will not need to convince anybody it happens; everyone will be familiar with it.

It was really shocking for me to realize that people, friends, family. neighbors, etc. were skeptical of my accounts of being followed and harassed by strangers.  All my years of being truthful and stable was not enough, to overcome the doubt that strangers would actually do this to someone they didn’t know.

As I said in an earlier entry, these strangers are exhibiting focussed hostile behavior towards you that is usually reserved for vendettas of a very personal nature. You lose support when you cannot come up with the answer to the question “WHY?” “Who would put this much effort into it?” The skepticism is understandable,  because it seems to defy logic. At first you can hardly believe it yourself. Your world is turned upside down and you feel disoriented, shocked even.  Realizing that everything is different then you thought it was  is easy to resist and hard to accept.

Early on, I remember reading information by other victims of gangstalking, and feeling skeptical about some of the experiences they  described. I was appalled that people were treating me with skepticism — but at the same time I was doubting what other victims (credible victims) were reporting. I remember reading Mark Rich’s “The Hidden Evil” on the web (before he had compiled it into a book). I never have doubted that he is a targeted Individual. Not then. Not Now. He is the real deal. But I was new to being gangstalked and I hadn’t experienced how pervasive it is–or how money (or lack of it) really is no object.
Mark Rich wrote of a trip that he took to visit someone (a sister, I think) in another state. He got on a plane and 2 of his stalkers boarded the plane with him. I didn’t believe it. I thought the stress of being stalked had caused him to see stalkers where there were none. Today… there is absolutely no doubt in my mind that his stalkers got on the plane with him, just as he described.

Eleanor White has a pamphlet that explains what is happening to us, It is a tool for victims to give to people who have never heard of gang stalking before. Because, as she explains, people who have not experienced what we have… are not ready for the truth. In essence, they can’t handle the truth. It doesn’t mean that the bystanding unaware public will never be able to handle the truth. What it means is that, the truth is something so out of their realm of experience that they need to have it spoon fed to them or they will choke on it and discount you as a Nutter. (I’ve been playing around with British Slang lately)  This spoon-feeding approach advocated by Eleanor is helpful. Her pamphlet really does help lower the credibility hurdle. I’ve used it with positive results. But I do have a less rigid approach.

The most important thing to me is to present the information in a way that is credible, even if what I am describing seems absolutely incredible to the uninitiated. Gangstalking takes place in the midst of the UNAWARE PUBLIC. They don’t see a thing–but they could, and would, if they were aware of it and/or looking for it. Exposure will take a lot of the power away from gangstalking activities. Getting the word out is the best way to stop it. I really believe that. That is my goal. That’s what I want. I want to see the rock these criminals are hiding under, overturned. I want to put an end to the cloak of plausible deniability and to them flying under the radar.

I hate having my credibility questioned. My personal feeling is that I have to temper my words so they don’t contribute to the unaware public associating the term gangstalking with anything other than what it is. A lot of the disinformation out there, attempts to paint it as some sort of fringe phenomenon. It isn’t. Gangstalking is organized and meticulously thought out and planned. It is not being perpetrated by humans with reptilian DNA, aliens, Satan or the Occult.

The hocus pocus fringe theories are put forth predominately by gangstalkers in an attempt to make victims look crazy. The fact that they have been so prolific about it has actually helped us, by spreading the term.  The term Gangstalking seems more common and main stream today than it was, even two years ago. They have done their part to help spread the term “gangstalking”. I expect it to become even more common with time.

Next post will address the many comments I have received.

Santa Cruz Cop Gets Played by Gangstalkers

The Santa Cruz Police Officer who responded to the traffic accident, that could have crippled my husband (see my last post,) got it wrong on his report. The report stated that the accident was caused by my husbands failure to yield the right of way, while entering  a traffic lane.

I am certain that the three gangstalkers who acted as witnesses are the reason the patrol officer, wrote a report that did not reflect the actual circumstances that led to the accident.  I think the witnesses followed a script.  I think the script used language and words that were deliberately chosen because they were powerful enough to influence the police, and keep real  witnesses to the accident at bay.   CAREFULLY CHOSEN WORDS CAN BE EXTREMELY POWERFUL. In this situation, they influenced the perception of the responding officer,  and ultimately shaped that officer’s written accident report and findings.

Evidence for this is found in the behavior and words of  all three of the witnesses.   These three witnesses, posing as strangers to each other and the driver of the Jeep.  All  used the exact same words, alternating between them and repeating . “I saw everything! I’ll be your witness!”.  They said it loud and often.  This began seconds after impact and  continued while the paramedics tended to my husband, and even while the officer interviewed the parties involved in the accident.  These gangstalkers are into NLP stuff.  It is basically using the words to influence the mind.  NLP goes hand in hand with hypnosis and the “power of suggestion”.  When it is non consensual and used to influence or control someones thoughts or behavior, it is unethical, but…. for gangstalkers, ethics isn’t really a concern.  Many NLP practitioners, no doubt, think applying NLP ethically, severely limits its power.  More info on NLP here.

When the cop took the witness statements, all three witness also used the exact same words to describe the accident. Those words are what made it onto the actual police report.  interestingly enough, the report references the three witness accounts,  but gives them one voice , saying  “all witness agreed that it would not have been possible for the Jeep to have avoided hitting the motorcyclist” .  Even more interesting is that the report only identifies one of the witnesses by name. Remember, these people want to remain anonymous. We would love to know their names. Why the other two names don’t appear anywhere on the report, seems a little sloppy to me. But maybe two of the witnesses slipped off, (planned, no doubt) before the officer could get their personal information.  .

Their real names are important to us. It helps us to connect dots, and often leads to the real names of other gangstalkers, and the groups they are members of. The connections are often family members who we recognize from times they followed us.  Sometimes it leads full circle, and connects back to a possible motive for targeting us.  Here is an example:

My awareness of  gangstalking started right after I threatened to sue Carrington College, in San Jose,  and told the dean, I thought their accreditation should be rescinded. I did this after an ugly experience where in my opinion (disclaimer:  my opinion, okay)  they  failed to deliver on their promises, had behaved unethically. and basically ripped me off and then tried to extort even more money out of me, after that.    The motive for my personal gangstalking is not known, but we do have a couple of theories.  Carrington College is one of those theories.  I have written about them at length, and will post it in the future.

The real name of one gangstalker,  led us to a relative of hers, who has also followed and harassed us.  This relative has a connection to Carrington College; so it lends support to one of our theories,  about why we were targeted. It’s not conclusive, but it’s another brick in the wall, so to speak. It also explains the importance of knowing the real names of these people.

We have often joked that we’re tempted to deliberately ram a car into one of the a$$hole stalkers, just so we could find out who they were from the police report. How disappointing to see only one of the three witnesses actually named on the report.

Okay, back to the accident:

 

The gangstalkers sprang into action, the moment the accident happened, to protect their fellow gangstalker from legal trouble. They had a job to do and they did it just as they planned and practiced for. They acted just like professional con artists.

The cop actually had everything he needed to ascertain exactly how the crash happened. But he also had to contend with the testimony of three lying witness, determined to influence the outcome.

The gangstalker who was involved in the accident, was clearly shaken up.  (my husband wondered at the time if maybe he didn’t have insurance, a license or had fake plates, because he was so nervous acting.)  My husband and the other driver both told the truth.   Inexplicably, neither one of their statements actually appears correctly in the report.

The Jeep’s driver told the officer that he “punched it around traffic to make the green left turn light.”   (Him and my husband were interviewed together.) This admission is found nowhere in the report and is extremely important. It was not part of the witness testimony, probably because it alters the perception of the driver as blameless .and in need of three impartial witnesses to protect HIS interests ( as evidenced by  “I’ll be YOUR witness”.)

My husband told the officer he was about to make a left into southbound traffic and he was looking right to make sure it was clear, when he was hit.  He says he never saw the car coming because there was no reason to look in that direction.  The report says my husband was looking at the driver when he hit him. That must have come from the witnesses.

Neither of my husbands statements are all that crucial, to understanding what happened, but it is worth noting that the phony witnesses statements are the only ones that appear on the report, and they were lies.

To understand how the accident really happened only required a few pieces of information, all of it readily available.

The Santa Cruz Officer who responded to the accident knew (or was told) the following:

1. The spot where the impact of the accident occurred ( at the very beginning of the Northbound left turn lane)

2. The Northbound lanes that proceed straight through,were stopped, backed up, and waiting for the red light to turn green.

3. My husband had maneuvered his bike through the two lanes of stopped traffic to get to the spot where the impact occurred. (he admitted this.  and it’s the only thing the witness did not lie about.)

4. The driver of the jeep had “punched it around the traffic to make the green left hand turn light.“

That leaves only one crucial question:   How did the driver of the jeep arrive at the spot where the accident happened?  HOW?

The traffic wasn’t moving in the northbound lanes, backed up well before the left turn lane began, effectively blocking access to the northbound turn lane. The jeep couldn’t have come from the gas station, squeezing between the cars backed up, waiting for the light, like my husbands motorcycle did.

There was only one way the driver could have gone around the traffic to reach the place where the left turn lane actually began, and the accident happened. The driver of the Jeep had to have been going North, traveling the wrong direction, in the Southbound lane, to circumvent the northbound traffic that was  stopped at the light.

That explains why my husband says he was looking right before turning into the southbound lane, and never saw the jeep. The jeep driver hit my husband broadside, unable to stop. Witness and the report said there would have been no way for the driver to have avoided the motorcyclist. My husband thinks there were probably skid marks because the jeep driver locked his brakes in an attempt to avoid the accident.

I disagree, about this being and unavoidable accident for the jeeps driver.  What if the jeep driver had not been going the wrong way on Ocean street, clearly against the law, in the first place?

Or try this thought experiment:

if my husband had been a couple of seconds faster, or the jeep driver, just a bit slower, they would have had a head on collision in the southbound lane. The jeep driver would have been going the wrong direction (north in a southbound lane) and clearly be at fault for the accident. The cause of the accident was set in motion prior to the impact, regardless of fault. If it had happened a couple of seconds earlier it would have happened in the southbound lane, instead of the start of the northbound left turn lane. It would have changed nothing about the jeep drivers actions. So how could it change his responsibility for the accident, once he is in motion?

Feel free to use the comment section, if you find fault with my logic here.

 

Since the jeep driver was already in motion, doesn’t he assume some responsibility, even if the impact takes place as he is illegally pulling into the northbound lane, instead of still traveling the wrong way to get to the point of impact?

I don’t know if what my husband did was legal, but I am certain what the driver of the jeep did, was NOT LEGAL. Yet, my husband who,  got broadsided by the jeep was found at fault, instead of the Jeep’s driver.

How does a police officer trained in accident investigation get it wrong, despite having all the evidence needed, at the scene, to get it right?

He was up against pros.

 

I think being trained to spot gangstalkers and witness who are not just lying, but using the same words and phrases to do so, would help them do their jobs better.

This isn’t a one time thing. These gangstalkers cause lots of accidents. They will do the same thing to you or anybody they hit or run over, if they continue to get away with it.

That witness testimony kept the cop from asking that all important question. HOW DID THE JEEP DRIVER ARRIVE AT THE POINT OF IMPACT? The answer to that would have shifted blame, and should not have been missed.  In this case the witness testimony was so persistent, so adamant, and so unanimous, that, that alone was given enough weight to determine the cause of the accident.

Witness testimony should only be used as a tool for determining what happened to cause the accident.  It shouldn’t be allowed to lead the officer away from the truth.   Officers need  training to see the signs that these people are running a game.  Training is the only way to keep from getting snowed by them.  There are certainly signs.

These witnesses behaved strangely, and the police department should train their officers to recognize the signs that signal collusion and gangstalking tactics are being used to influence the outcome of an investigation.

There isn’t really anybody at an accident scene that can legitimately make the claim. “I saw everything” .  (You would need an overhead view.) This accident had three of them.  Nowhere on the report does it state where the witness were when the accident happened.  It’s also missing, just like two of their names.

These witnesses kept saying. “I’ll be your witness” repeatedly to the jeep driver”. Clearly, not unbiased, and again, an odd thing to have all three witnesses say repeatedly.

And maybe the cop should have noticed how all three witness avoided eye contact with the motorcyclist,  they told there stories without a glance in his direction, usually keeping their backs to him. Odd behavior all the way around.  Of course the officer didn’t actually get to  see the strangest behavior, which happened before he arrived. All three witnesses stepped over and ignored a bleeding man in the street, and convened a pow wow at the window of the unhurt jeep driver.

My complaint is not so much about the officer, as the departments failure to train their officers to go with the evidence, instead of allowing witness testimony alone to determine fault. Officers should be on the lookout for witness testimony that is all seeing, all knowing, and told verbatim by different witnesses.  It’s classic gangstalker.

The report should have identified all three witnesses by name, and given their location at the time they witnessed the accident. It was incomplete. And even more important…it was wrong.

The gangstalkers are here. they are working Santa Cruz, and they are working Santa Cruz PD.  It’s not too late for Santa Cruz Police Department  to get it right, by training officers to recognize gangstalkers in action.

 

Disinformation is a tool for Censorship

Disinformation is a tool for Censorship.

Gangstalkers act as trolls on the internet. They are keeping tabs on the postings and comments made by their victims. If they read something that might expose gangstalking, they leap into action. You see a lot of their handiwork in the form of comments following articles or posts, which cover the subject of Organized Harassment..

You should be able to spot their lies; for people who claim to NOT believe in Gangstalking… They spend an awful lot of time on forums that are specific to the topic.

I don’t really believe in ghosts, I am certain aliens are not visiting earth, but gangstalking is absolutely real. As you read about all the comments that say how paranoid, delusional, schizophrenic (take your pick) people who claim to be gangstalked are….you may finally realize that there are an awful lot of people, writing an awful lot of derogatory stuff, in the comment sections of victim’s websites. Real blogs will probably take advantage of the moderation feature (I know I do) and delete derogatory comments. These criminals are WAY too interested in influencing other people to NOT believe, in something they insist isn’t even real, in the first place.

If you don’t believe in something… A normal reaction would be to not dwell on it… The Internet is a huge place, with something for everybody’s interests.. I don’t believe in Big Foot, so spending my time on-line, with people who do, seems like a big waste. I’m not that interested in convincing unknown other people, that people who DO believe in Big Foot, are disturbed or delusional. Really, I just don’t care if complete strangers, do, or do not, believe in Big Foot.

If I thought Gangstalking wasn’t real (assuming I had ever even heard of it) I am not going to be spending a lot of time on victim’s web sites, trying to convince everybody they are crazy. Who cares that much about controlling the beliefs of others? Gangstalking seems to be all about control. This extreme interest in gangstalking is just not normal for someone who claims its a fantasy of delusional minds. It’s all part of a the big disinformation campaign, to keep it from seeing the light of day.

Since I wrote my last post a day or two ago, the Gangstalkers have been busy, I mentioned victim and activist, Eleanor White, as a credible source. They took her booklet and put out a hacked one where they make her sound like a nutcase. The booklet uses the same format, as the real ones authored by Eleanor. The hacked one tells victims it is all hopeless, and to keep quiet and not tell anyone about the organized harassment. I commented in my last post, that they usually put the info making the author sound crazy. right up front. Gangstalkers responded by inserting the really crazy stuff further in: that she brushes her teeth with ivory soap, wears sandpaper in her underwear and uses a nail attached to a large stick to make a hole in her clothes to scratch herself because Gangstalkers make her itch. They want you to think that Eleanor is a few screws loose.

There were three new links to her work as of yesterday ( dated 2010, so you wouldn’t think they were just first posted just yesterday) that I am sure were placed there in case my web page directed any traffic to her. Every one of them was altered to destroy her credibility. That’s a very swift response. They also fleshed out some of the pages that I accused of having faux fronts. As I said, they have been busy since my last post.

Every response they post to the web to refute the very existence of Gangstalking, litters the Internet with more proof that it does. True or false, the sheer amount of things on the Internet that reference it….indicate somebody knows about it. Either real victims who see the Internet as the only way to get the public to understand what’s happening, or the people posting whole pages, posing as crazies to discredit us… We’ve all been busy getting the word out and the proliferation of false leads may help us more than it hurts us.

The Immediate response to my latest blog post about disinformation, says volumes about how serious they are about containing the truth. This isn’t something that should just anger victims of the Gangstalkers….it should alarm everybody. Think about it in more general terms. They are interfering with everybody’s right to access information. Do you think someone has the right to block your access to a free exchange of thoughts and ideas. ? Do you think anyone has the right to prevent someone from expressing their right to freedom of speech, by deliberate sabotage? Do they have the right to direct interested parties to spoofed sites by overwhelming search engines with false leads? Do they have the right to replace real sites with fake ones? This is a deliberate attempt to prevent you from hearing real people’s opinions and making up your own mind. This is a form of censorship.

I don’t know if this is illegal, but it certainly seems unconstitutional. This interferes with everybody’s right to participate in a free exchange of ideas– They are attempting to censor the Internet and stop you from accessing information that is available through tactics, that on a smaller scale, act like a denial of service attack.

First they block access to information about Gangstalking ? What’s next? These people need to be stopped, or they will soon make censorship their primary business. Wake up! This is a deliberate power play. People who want power this desperately aren’t going to stop with just controlling your access to websites telling the truth about Gangstalking? The more successful they are at censuring the truth about Organized Harassment, the closer they are to obscuring something that YOU think is vitally important. Help us spread the word. Everybody has a right to available information…. Information that will allow them to form an intelligent opinion. Censurship and secrecy are like acid, eroding human rights violations and eating away at the very foundation of a free society.

If you read this, please comment in the section below. I have changed it so that you no longer have to log in or put your email address. I want to know that I am reaching somebody and not being censored by Gangstalkers.

Disinformation: How to Spot The Lies and the Fakes

I need to address the issue of disinformation, because anyone researching the topic of Gangstalking, is going to be confronted with it repeatedly.

I mentioned a little bit about the organization of a Gangstalking group in my last post. The other thing that this group of ORGANIZED HARRASSERS has, is a division of labor. In a legit company, this is akin to having different departments in an organization being responsible for different functions within the company.

A Gangstalking or organized harassment campaign, is a very deliberate, planned and purposeful undertaking. There is absolutely no doubt in my mind that there is a master plan. As I’ve said before, being in the dark about motive is not evidence that there isn’t one. In my opinion, no one puts this much effort into anything without a definite plan.

The proximity of the apartments the Gangstalkers have taken over, within view of our house, provides them access into our lives, and we, in turn, learn quite a bit about them. This is not unique between Gangstalkers and Targets; this is the state of affairs that exists between any neighbors.

There are clearly people within the organization, whose job it is to spread propaganda and disinformation, via the media. This is painfully obvious to those of us who are living this nightmare. Remember, unlike other crimes, gangstalking happens over and over again; We see this group in action every single day. This gives us Targeted Individuals, considerable familiarity with tactics and methods. Much more so than victims of most other types of crime.

Disinformation is absolutely something these Gangstalking groups consider to be a cornerstone to their enterprise. Their infiltration of the Internet, with fake web sites and blogs, has been prolific. These phony sites serve one purpose: to mislead anyone looking into the claims made by victims of Gangstalking. They overwhelm search engines results, sending people seeking more information on Gangstalking, (and other synonymous terms) to their phony sites.

There seem to be four primary ways that disinformation is packaged:

First, some of the disinformation tries to make you think that the entire concept of gangstalking is an urban legend or just another crazy story that circulates the internet rumor mills. The purpose of these type posts and sites is to make you think that Gangstalking is not real.

If you don’t fall for that, (and you shouldn’t, because the use of organized stalking has an easily verifiable, well documented history, spanning the globe) there is a second type of disinformation meant to make you think that the people who are being victimized by Gangstalking, are crazy. Gangstalkers do this by posing as victims.

These fake victims take many things right off the pages written by real victims, and make a few key changes. The changes are dispersed throughout the writing, but often appear right near the first paragraph or so (so as not to be missed by the reader.)

These fake victims start out by making outrageous claims, of the kind that are sure to make people question their sanity. Real victims have encountered skeptics too many times already. We instinctively try to establish common ground, or credibility, before making outrageous and unprovable claims. This is especially true, if those claims are sure to alienate possible supporters, right off the bat.

Real victims aren’t claiming the occult or non human entities are behind these crimes. We don’t think these people are performing magic tricks. We think they are using available technology to stalk and harass. If a victim says these people are descendant from Reptilian bloodlines-NEWSFLASH… That’s not a real victim. Most real victims do not think harassment by airplanes is their biggest problem. We are facing daily harassment right here on the ground, which is a bit closer, more in your face, and personal. Being harassed by planes is probably not high on the list of complaints made by real victims. We want you to believe us. Fake victims absolutely DO NOT WANT anyone to believe what they are claiming.

Another way to recognize fake sites is through the links and clicks on the front page. Quite often, they either don’t go anywhere, or go to an error message, telling you the page you are looking for, isn’t available. The front page of the site is a facade. It looks like there’s a real blog or web site, but there isn’t. It is a paper tiger or faux front. It is essentially a lazy attempt to fool the reader.

The content on these fake pages is also lazy. They try to give the appearance of legitimacy, by repeating, verbatim, content stolen from a real victims page. There is very little variation. Lots of the planted links that google comes up with, will show different web addresses, but they all read fairly consistent. Real victims use many of the same key phrases, but when we want to share an entire page of someone else’s writing… We have links for that. We want to be a cohesive community… sharing new ideas and experiences, in an attempt to stop Gangstalking. We are not flooding the Internet with information that is already everywhere…that would be the work of the disinformation specialists, who appear far too lazy to create original content to balance out the disinformation.

Eleanor White has a page rating various web pages on Gangstalking, based on whether they are an attempt to help our cause, spread disinformation (hurting us) or fall somewhere in between. Her list gives valuable information, useful for learning to make the distinction on your own, It is by no means comprehensive or current. The Gangstalkers are literally flooding the Internet with phony pages at a rapid rate.

Disinformation also comes in the form of videos posted on Vimeo and YouTube. There are lots of them. if you want to see what some of my Gangstalkers look like…..they are the stars, in several of the YouTube videos about Gangstalking. They claim to be victims…but guess what? These exact people have stalked me on multiple occasions. They are not victims, they are perpetrators (as is everybody involved in deliberately spreading disinformation to discredit real victims). Some of my stalkers, turned video star, wear costumes (I.e. disguises) in the videos–not good disguises, because they want me to know it’s them (another way of harassing). Victims wearing costumes are almost always not real victims.

Basically my gangstalking crew considers themselves to be film makers and video stars. This group make videos to taunt and discredit the people they are harassing (me and my husband,) as well as the victims of their fellow Gangstalkers. They might say things like: “then all the dogs in the neighborhood started following me to harass me. The owners told the dogs to do it, so they could have a day off.” Even if everything else said in the video sounded legit…a statement like that is made’ so that you will dismiss the (fake) victim as a kook. The idea here, is that it will cause you to, subsequently, discount all accounts of Gangstalking, being told by all (real) victims. In some cases a video will string you along for 15 minutes and end with a frame where a gangstalker holds up a placard that says “ha ha, we fooled you!”

Most of the videos I’ve seen appear to be phony especially, if they aren’t linked to a real victims blog. Here’s one that is legit and worth watching: From our local news station. Here is a link to a slideshow where pertinent frames have been pulled from a video taken by Debbie Newhook, another target who has been active in exposing this crime.

I will cover the fourth method of spreading disinformation in my next post.